Talk:Survation

Deletion Proposal
I feel that concerns over notoriety are overstated - there are multiple third party sources referencing the organisation in major UK media sources discussing it's polls (e.g. http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/public-tell-mps-to-lay-off-the-press-1442637 and http://news.sky.com/story/1043407/tories-handed-eu-referendum-polls-boost) and commenting on its methodology (http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012/04/10/the-ukip-bogey-bear-still-there/). It is also regularly referenced on the popular polling websites UK Polling Report (http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/category/survation) and politicalbetting.com (http://www7.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2011/11/26/survation-has-ukip-into-double-figures/).

I admit that the article as it stands needs significant improvement and would happy contribute to that if someone would give me some guidance on what needs doing, but I don't see that that is relevant to the notoriety of the subject itself. The article pages for other UK polling organisations ComRes and Populus Ltd could probably also use some work at the same time.

Pbrione (talk) 16:17, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Yea all the polling pages need some work on to be fair. I'd say the rule for allowing them to have a wiki page is that they must be members of the British polling council, all of which are, including survation130.88.52.104 (talk) 18:03, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Name?
I note the name appears to be Survation Ltd not Survation. JRPG (talk) 10:21, 31 August 2014 (UTC)