Talk:Switzerland during the World Wars

effectuated
"effectuated" ? Ouch. Is that even a word?
 * Yes. &mdash; g026r 06:26, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Not a good one Diomedea Exulans (talk) 17:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Expansion of the World War I section
This section is tiny and insignificant. There needs to be more elaboration and more filling to this section. Please add info to this section. Jean-Paul 07:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

What is "The size of the Swiss military was considered by both sides in the pre-War years, especially in the Schlieffen Plan." supposed to mean? Diomedea Exulans (talk) 17:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Swiss concentration camps
Please, somebody who knows about this subject: write a Wikipedia article about it. I heard on a radio program devoted to music that a great violinist, Josef Schmidt (sp?) died in a Swiss "concentration camp" [the words of the radio host]. So I headed to Wikipedia to see if neutral Switzerland could in fact have had concentration camps. As of today (13 Aug 07) there is nothing in Wikipedia even remotely related to this subject. But after much Googling I came up with an interesting website: http://swissinternees.tripod.com/wauwilermoos.html

I'm not an historian so I feel uncomfortable writing a Wikipedia article - but someone needs to, I feel.

Thanks!

71.129.174.133 20:01, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * hi! the word concentration camp is wrong in this context. --Philtime (talk) 11:47, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

The largest internment camp in switzerland, opened in 1940 in Bueren, was a trial to reach better managament efficieny by concentrating the internees in one place. For a short duration, the internment camp was thus called "Concentrationslager" (note the different spelling to the german "Konzentrationslager" and no, it wasnt anything like a germen Konzentrationslager). After management problems and clashes between polish inmates and guards, the whole project was regarded as a failure. See also ""Concentrationslager": Büren an der Aare 1940-1946 : das grösste Flüchtlingslager der Schweiz im Zweiten Weltkrieg ", ISBN-13: 978-3906419039 129.132.31.142 (talk) 11:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Nik, 12:51,

Konzentrationslager or Concentration Camp was originally the term used for harmless internment camps. Thats the reason why the Germans called their camps that, as an euphemism to hide the real meaning. Only after WW2 it has got this extremely negative meaning, so the swiss camps should be called internment camps. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.186.215.187 (talk) 01:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Merge articles
It seems that there are three articles with overlapping information:

1. History of Switzerland

2. Modern history of Switzerland

3. Switzerland during the World Wars

I think these should be combined -- or if that is too long for one article, at least edit them so they do not overlap. --Semitemos (talk) 01:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)


 * No merging here. See Talk:History_of_Switzerland. Lupo 16:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Inadequate Accounting of Switzerland Role as a Supporter of Nazis and Fascists
I just find this article to weak in its information of the connections the Swiss had to the Nazis and other war thugs and in its expression of just how much financial fraud relating to Nazi war crimes went on. And what about those rich and powerful families and figures from around the world who stayed in or headed to Switzerland to take "refuge" in the center of the Nazi empire? Why on Earth would anyone choose to escape war by going to a 'neutral' country in the heart of the Nazi realm? Is someone trying to rewrite history? 203.131.210.82 (talk) 04:35, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Switzerland hid Nazi Gold during WWII, and turned into hard currency so that Hitler could prosecute the war. Switzerland also made Nazi armaments and shipped them to Germany. They also stopped Jewish refugees at the border and sent them back to certain death in German Concentration camps, consequently, many Jews committed suicide at the border, rather than go back. The Swiss also had anti-aircraft emplacements that shot down US B-17 bombers, murdering their crews. Swiss gun emplacements are still carved into their mountains today. The Swiss had Billions of dollars of Jewish wealth in their vaults after the war, and many family never saw a penny of that money, and the one's who did only received a little decades later after the Swiss were challenged by US legal actions. The Swiss were by no means neutral during the war, they served Hitler, otherwise they would have been invaded like every other Country. They committed crimes against humanity, and it is very difficult to hear this nonsense that they were neutral. See Dead Men's Secrets on the Military History Channel - Episode "Tracking Nazi Gold" 2004 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.158.232.133 (talk) 01:41, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

In my opinion the article needs some fixing but it's certainly not as inaccurate as you both say. Let's start with the claim that "Switzerland hid Nazi gold during WWII [ true] so that Hitler could prosecute the war (false- there is no well-accepted academic evidence it was in the declared interest of the Swiss state for the Nazis to continue their campaign and hence continue a war that led to food rationing in Switzerland, among other deprivations suffered by the Swiss population- I am NOT saying these deprivations are the same as those suffered by some other peoples during the war, but they are deprivations nonetheless). "Switzerland made Nazi armaments"- true, but they made armaments for Allied countries too. Regarding refugees, I think the article refers to the scholarly literature sufficiently. Regarding the shooting down of US bombers, the Swiss shot down German bombers too, both US and German aircraft were shot down, which is mentioned in the article. On Holocaust-era Jewish wealth in Swiss banks: The Volcker Commission found a few dozen million USD worth of account not billions. The claim that the Swiss "served Hitler" and that the article needs to be rewritten in that tone is hyperbolic at best. Also, there were German plans to invade Switzerland, despite its declared neutrality. Switzerland was already surrounded by Axis powers and the Germans saw it as unnecessary. Henri Guisan, the Swiss Head General ordered his troops to fight to the death in the case of a German invasion. The reason the Dutch/Belgians, for example, were invaded is that Hitler needed a clear path to France to achieve his goals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:C000:AC50:5C0:294D:7F04:7F5C (talk) 11:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Split discussion
Only from a superficial level could these two topics be seen as being similar enough to be placed in a single article. Aside from declaring a state of neutrality while being surrounded by belligerent nations, Switzerland's situations had very different sociopolitical contexts. During World War I, Switzerland was wrought with internal struggle over the very question of neutrality for the first few years. In World War II, the government sponsored attempts to define Swiss identity to keep its people distanced from Fascist leanings. There's also the whole question of Nazi and Jewish gold, refugees, severe infringements on neutrality, and very serious plans to invade and annex the country, none of which can be directly related to the earlier war experience. As the article currently stands, I don't believe it facilitates the fleshing-out of its most vital components. I think this can best be rectified via split. -Indy beetle (talk) 05:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Split. I agree with Indy beetle. Switzerland in World War I and World War II are extremely different subjects. There is no reason to group Swiss actions, reactions, and relations during World War I with World War II as the two wars were not connected in that each war was fought for different reasons and involved different conflicting nations. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 05:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment It's only 35kB at the moment. It could expand to 60kB before needing to be split on size grounds. One option that could be considered is just leaving it in one article, just adding material to either the World War I or World War II sections, until it's a bit bigger. Honestly I have no real opinion either way - I'm just pleased it's being expanded. Buckshot06 (talk) 14:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Split. I agree to split because the two topics are very different.  Switzerland took vastly different positions and acted very differently in both wars. Elliot321 (talk) 13:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Miscellaneous
"Between 10,000 and 24,000 Jewish civilian refugees were refused entry" I couldn't find it on the mentioned page 107 in the bergier report. Where does this number come from? --178.193.39.223 (talk) 15:02, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Generate two separate articles - but keep this one as well
Yes, there should be two separate pages on WW1 and WW2, since the current material on both of these topics is suitable for expanding and enriching.

The present article should also be retained, with the copy on WW1 and WW2 somewhat shortened-down, with links to the dedicated article in each case. The section on the inter-war period could remain as it is. Valetude (talk) 17:31, 15 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Why keep this one if we were to have articles on the other two? Aside from the generality that the country was neutral during both wars, so many different things occurred. That's like having an umbrella article World War I and World War II for World War I and World War II. -Indy beetle (talk) 02:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Switzerland during the World Wars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928205411/http://www.sncweb.ch/pressemitteilung/1_2005/maerz05/us-bomben.htm to http://www.sncweb.ch/pressemitteilung/1_2005/maerz05/us-bomben.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Map
The map in the first section is incorrect. It shows Italy as an ally of Germany and Austria when in fact it was an ally of Britain and France. Only in World War Two was Italy an ally of Germany. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.114.44.56 (talk) 23:58, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Image states "Military alliances in 1914". Italy changed sides after WW1 began. See Triple Alliance (1882). 2001:56A:FA59:F800:5CF2:C911:3DA1:E589 (talk) 04:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * SwissArmyAlps.jpg

"surrounded by mountains"
I've edited the article lead, which had read as follows: "During World War I and World War II, Switzerland maintained armed neutrality, and was not invaded by its neighbors, in part because it is surrounded by mountains."

The problem is that, although there certainly are quite a few mountains in Switzerland, it's not really "surrounded" by them, and in fact most of the German-Swiss border doesn't have a lot of large mountains that would provide a significant impediment to an invading army. And most of Switzerland's major German-speaking population centers are in a relatively flat area between the German border to the north and the Alps to the south. See:

Had the Germans invaded from the north in order to seize control of these German-speaking population centers (e.g. Basel, Zürich), topography would not have been a significant impediment to their advance, although the mountains further south would have provided some strategic depth to the Swiss defenders, from which to launch counterattacks and wage guerilla warfare. -2003:CA:8748:5C3A:786F:23E2:4E6A:ABBC (talk) 16:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Incorrect citation for number of rejected Jewish refugees
I noticed that the article says "Between 10,000 and 24,000 Jewish civilian refugees were refused entry", citing the Bergier report. However, on page 117, this report reads as follows:

So in fact, this figure is not about Jewish refugees specifically but about total refugees.

I have no expertise in this and leave it to others to cite more accurate figures/citations.

Of note, the relevant section of the German Wikipedia states the following (translated using Deepl.com):

``` James Quinnies Dog (talk) 11:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)