Talk:TEXEL

Candidate for deletion
CSD criteria G11, A7, subjects fail to meet the relevant (no, or at least significant, coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject), most advertising content (self-promotion ?) are some of the reasons given. Buying Stirling Energy Systems is not enough, after six years, I can't find relevant sources about what the have delivered, if anything. --Robertiki (talk) 02:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I suggest you AFD it. I removed the speedy tag because I don't think it's clear-cut enough to be an A7 - and certainly not a G11 (at least after I cut all the puffery out of it a few years ago); I have no particular attachment to the page, and would not mind in the least if it were deleted after an AFD. Pinkbeast (talk) 17:50, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 11 December 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. We generally need secondary source evidence to find the common name. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  05:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

United Sun Systems International → TEXEL Energy Storage – Hello, I tried to move the page United Sun Systems International to the organization's new name TEXEL. While there is a redirect I believe the page should be moved to its new name. There are quite a few references for this online. Can anyone please look into this. Yaywoh (talk) 13:44, 11 December 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. — Nnadigoodluck  █ █ █ 09:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 19:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC)


 * queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 19:46, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The photo shows that the company is clearly called "United Sun Systems" and the current title name is already common for the company. Therefore, I don't see a valid reason to move the page.  Seventyfiveyears (talk) 16:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The company has according to my research changed its name back in 2018. Here is an independent |Yaywoh%5D%5D reference for it among many. The company's website also says the same.Yaywoh (talk) 18:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Support per fixed link BegbertBiggs (talk) 13:58, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose: That source doesn't use the proposed name "TEXEL Energy Storage". Also, is TEXEL an abbreviation? Why the all-caps? —&hairsp;BarrelProof (talk) 19:48, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I haven't found any reference to TEXEL being an abbreviation. That's probably just how the company writes its name as it is mentioned everywhere in the same way. References all over the internet say that the company has been renamed to TEXEL Energy Storage though. Yaywoh (talk) 10:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Oppose. We really need a naming convention to deal with corporate rebrandings such as this one. No amount of primary source evidence can justify a page move. Andrewa (talk) 17:44, 3 January 2021 (UTC)