Talk:TM Travel

Restoration of article
This operator is a major operator of services around Sheffield and the surrounding area and is notable - other much smaller operators have a wiki entry so why not TM Travel? Thoughts on this? 79.75.133.174 (talk) 17:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately in regards to notability I would say Google News results proves that this isn't a notable subject and IMHO it's unlikely it ever will be. Of course GNews isn't the be-all and end-all but there needs to be substantial articles which unfortunately for this subject there isn't any. Plus 1 AFD participated and the closing admin belived this was worthy of a merge too,
 * Anyway you're more than welcome to start an WP:RFC and seek outside/neutral views on the issue, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:38, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If we expand the scope of the article to include routes operated by the company, I think there is enough here. The previous AfD was poorly attended and should probably have been a no consensus close IMO.
 * Formal warning for TM Travel over bus services
 * TM Travel improves Peak Line 218
 * #AYearOfBuses 218: Peak Line Sheffield – Bakewell
 * The Peak District
 * Rising costs put end to a Sutton bus service
 * I'm happy to recreate and expand the article. NemesisAT (talk) 10:29, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey @NemesisAT, Personally I'm still not seeing enough notability here however you'd be more than welcome to recreate and expand I have no issues with that, Many thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 16:35, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
 * A updated version has been created at Draft:TM Travel. This can be expanded and if it gets to the point where somebody feels the reasons given in the AfD have been overcome, can be nominated for publishing using the Articles for Creation tool where an uninvolved editor can assess. Haxbone (talk) 06:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for this, though it's better to just restore the article here as that'll preserve the history. I may give it a shot later. NemesisAT (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2022 (UTC)