Talk:TOM Group

Untitled
So this article has not been rated yet? Well, when it is, it should say that it needs to be more neutral, and cut the company-generated blather. Earthlyreason 09:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * One of the reasons why this article still has not been rated is because the WPHK community is still trying to reach consensus as to the assessment criteria. However, I have in the mean time, added a tag to notify other editors. Luke! 16:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

rewriting
Working on the rewriting and update of information. Idunno1234 (talk) 03:17, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

advert tag
Re-added the advert tag, it seems to have disappeared somewhere since 2007. This entire article still reads like an ad/press release by TOM Group. As well the TOM-Skype fiasco is entirely missing. Perhaps it needs a db-spam? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.74.203.206 (talk • contribs) 03:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Censoring
How come this article does not mention the political censoring of Skype messages in TOM-Skype performed by TOM Group? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.49.123.21 (talk) 00:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)