Talk:Tamwar Masood

Gay?
I couldnt decide what to do about adding the rumour about him being gay, so I just went ahead and put it in, but ive said it's yet to be confirmed. If anyone thinks we should wait til it is confirmed, then feel free to remove. Gung adin  ♦  18:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * From an OOU perspective I would say to leave it in. I love what you've done with the OOU stuff on newer characters by the way! &mdash; AnemoneProjectors (会話) 20:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it's actually quite simple doing OOU stuff for new characters, because there's more sources. I'd always assumed it would be harder because there's no storylines to discuss. Gung adin  ♦  21:26, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Merge maybe?
Tamwar isn't really a notable character in this and is quit minor. Maybe there should be a page for minor characters on a regular basis that characters like Tamwar can fit into until they have more notable stories and a place in the media.

Kind of like it has been done for other Soap Opera style articles. Thankyou. Raintheone (talk) 08:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * He's on a contract, and the article has sufficient out of universe information, so no. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 16:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Most of the links provided are about a past Asian family that left way before he came into it. Sounds like more point of view using them in this article. Besides I just don't think their should be different rules for different branches of articles, on the subject of soap opera's. Most characters have these links, yet Coronation Street, Hollyoaks and Emmerdale get merges. Raintheone (talk) 21:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Perhaps you should spend more time sourcing and rewriting Hollyoaks and Corrie articles, then their characters could also have their own pages. Gung adin  21:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * (edit conflict) Have you not seen the EastEnders minor lists? The fact is, this is a regular character, whose article has an out of universe section, whether it has information about the Ferreiras or not, it's relevant, and the character should have his own article. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 21:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Thankyou, I'll do that on your advice. And get the sources for them. You are right, Tamwar should have his own page really, as every character on a contract should.Raintheone (talk) 21:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Tamwar Masood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cre.gov.uk/Default.aspx.LocID-0hgnew06m.RefLocID-0hg00900c008.Lang-EN.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091010024717/http://media247.co.uk/bizasia/newsarchive/2009/10/eastenders_rude.php to http://media247.co.uk/bizasia/newsarchive/2009/10/eastenders_rude.php
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5wg6sk3pN?url=http://lowculture.co.uk/index.php/2009/10/31/soapstar-superstars-septemberoctober/ to http://lowculture.co.uk/index.php/2009/10/31/soapstar-superstars-septemberoctober/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100503195057/http://watchwithmothers.net/2010/04/27/just-a-thought-eastenders-in-praise-of-tamwar/ to http://watchwithmothers.net/2010/04/27/just-a-thought-eastenders-in-praise-of-tamwar/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:59, 25 May 2017 (UTC)