Talk:TeamSpeak

TeamSpeak stable client release needs changing
TeamSpeak 3 latest stable release is not 3.5.2, 3.5.3 released an month ago. Chernobyl452 (talk) 15:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Get ride of licensed providers
Licensed providers have no place on this page since its just advertising. Since anyone can become a licensed provider I move that this be removed from the external links section and a notice prohibiting linking to server host be kept at the top of the discussion since it seems like every few weeks there is a different site adveratising here.--71.197.86.11 (talk) 02:06, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Nice Advertisement
Ought to incorporate markketing literature directly.

Too Biased
Too Biased —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.123.153.254 (talk • contribs)

Reduncancy
Having both competition and similar programs sections are redundant. I also agree that this article is too biased. CompIsMyRx 04:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC)


 * What about this article is biased? As someone who does not use any of the software referenced here, it looks fine to me.  Strait 23:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Uncited claims
In the "similar programs" section, I've moved all the expository text here due to lack of cites. See WP:NOR.


 * Ventrilo is another program similar to TeamSpeak which is rising in popularity among first-person shooter players especially in the electronic sports scene and also among players of other computer game genres.
 * Roger Wilco - while it is a major rival, it still has a much smaller user base than TeamSpeak.
 * GameComm is the newest rival program to TeamSpeak, although currently in beta testing.

--Neurophyre(talk) 19:04, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to add stuff
I'm not sure if this artical is on any ones watch list how ever if it is I'm going to add a sections on the client and server that will probably be over detailed. This is because I have to create or add to a wiki artical for a school project. --Autonomous Operations 04:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the warning, but you should probably point your teacher to School_and_university_projects if they have not already read it. Adding unencyclopedic information to an article is not a good assignment.  Cheers, Neurophyre(talk) 07:18, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry about the violation of some of the policies I was unaware of them. This is the first time I have made a significent wiki contribution. I mainly trying to add any significent detial since I have to find a way to make this article 5 pages long for the asignment.
 * Autonomous Operations 02:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * No offense, but nothing we are going to allow is going to be 5 pages. You are better off just making it on a sub-page of your user page. BJ Talk 02:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I understand however as rediculus as this asignment is it makes up a large part of my grade. I was left with the choice between choosing to add a article I knew litle or nothing about or choosing one that I could at least add valid information to. Well I doubt most of my peers will even be able to come near 3 pages I feel I should apoligize for the 300-450 pages my class potentialy will submit to Wikipedia that will be sub par. Probably at 'most' this article will be 2 pages. I will try to keep it as factual as possible.
 * Autonomous Operations 03:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * bjWeeks is not in control of anything nor he is allowed to state what "we" will allow. I would recommend that you organize your content and discuss the matter with a "real editor". If you need any help, just post here and I will do my best to guide you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.70.153 (talk • contribs) 21:42, November 28, 2006
 * Sigh, now I'm getting trolled... Really, a 5 page article on a voice chat client without going to far into detail is not going to happen. BJ Talk 04:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The problem here is a bad assignment. --Neurophyre(talk) 17:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Free TeamSpeak Providers?
Why it was removed? I don't consider it as spam because if someone is unfamiliar with TeamSpeak and he checks the Wikipedia page, I doubt he would be annoyed by two links that provide free TeamSpeak servers. Besides, it's directly related to TeamSpeak - maybe someone will search for TeamSpeak providers and prices for that, so he'd check Wikipedia page for useful links and search engines could index this and help someone. Seriously, it's free, so it's no used to gain any sort of money, the sites don't have ads, so I really don't see any harm done. Please reconsider this as I've seen people paying for TS servers and they didn't even had a clue they can get for free. - 3FaST 09:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I believe it falls under the advertising category but you’d have to ask the person who removed it.Autonomous Operations 22:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, it's more of a External links add-on than advertising, but the person who removed it considered it was spam. But okay, I just thought free hosting is helpful. - 3FaST 08:05, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * See WP:NOT. Also, most search engines do not follow links from MediaWiki sites because the software marks all external links with the NOFOLLOW attribute -- something which spammers never seem to learn. --Neurophyre(talk) 08:52, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * And many well known search spiders ignore NOFOLLOW, as well. 67.42.85.219 06:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

GameComm
Why is this "software" listed under similar programs? The software does not exist, and neither does the web site. Supposedly, it's supposed to be out in 2007, but should something that does not yet exist and who's web site is currently dead even be listed? The listing should be removed.

Jake b 06:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * See my comment on the Ventrilo talk page. BJ Talk 06:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Link Fixed
htht —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.119.8.205 (talk) 15:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC) The new ts website is the same except with go in it, I edited the page to fix that.

Features section
The current TeamSpeak 3 features section, as added by Xxsonyboy4lfexx (talk), is more or less a copy of the official website http://www.teamspeak.com/?page=teamspeak3. - 83.254.214.192 (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Reported this to Copyright_problems/2008_August_12/Articles - 83.254.214.192 (talk) 00:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Removed. BJ Talk 01:10, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Mac OS X Client
I have removed an incorrect sentence saying there is an unsupported Mac OS X version, although TeamSpeex is an alternative, since the unsupported version IS TeamSpeex. I also added a section on TeamSpeak solutions for Mac OS X, i.e. TeamSpeex. See here for my edit. If my edit is incorrect or if you know more about TeamSpeex, then feel free to edit/expand this section as you see fit (or possibly even move TeamSpeex to a different article, since it is a different software), since I'm no expert on it. EdoDodo (talk) 12:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * it should talk about how teamspeak 3.0 now has beta support for the mac —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erifneerg (talk • contribs) 07:52, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Broken page
Unless it's only my browser doing it, the page is kind of broken, cue repeating languages on the 'languages' tab and repeating External Links. I honestly don't know how to fix it, so would anyone who knows do it?(189.32.170.219 (talk) 00:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC))

Outdated
The entire page is pretty outdated since almost everything has changed with TS3... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.218.30.34 (talk) 16:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

"freeware"
i may object that only the teamspeak 2/3 client is freeware. the serversoftware is not, as can be seen here http://sales.tritoncia.com/pricing.php

besides this article lacks of a criticism section. (ts3 client: no means to disable auto-update, so update-server can track your ip for marketing stuff; arbitrary blacklisting of teamspeak-servers - complains can be seen in the official team speak forums.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.185.155.94 (talk) 13:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Severs are free for non-profits up to 512 slots. --RSnook (talk) 08:10, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Fake informations
I used teamspeak for a really short time before they teach me ow they don't care about their customers. I have send a mail to inform them than the flag for my country was not the good one here is their answer "according to several sources the kanak flag is an official flag of new Caledonia since 2010, so there is nothing wrong in using it." I live here since a few generation but for them i'm the one who is wrong.... and for they "several sources" i haven't find any official one but i recognize that we can find every thing on the internet, the only thing to do is to trust in first the people who are concerned don't you think because they don't. So for me thinking the customer is dumb is their way of working. I answer to this "insult mail" but they don't think a deserved any response from theme so... who is the most dumb? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonzu (talk • contribs) 00:45, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

TeamSpeak version 5
There isn't really anything much about the newer version of teamspeak that is in beta, TeamSpeak 5, on this page. I have never used it so I can't really add anything about it, but if someone has good knowledge about TS5 then I suggest there should be a section detailing this. Joncoale (talk) 06:14, 28 January 2021 (UTC)