Talk:The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch

Elaborating on acceptance
Maybe I'm insane to accept an AfC submission with 8(!) previous declines that's about a barely notable subject, but I did. Mainly for a few reasons: Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 20:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Most of the declines were when WP:ULTRAs repeatedly resubmitted the article without meaningful improvement.
 * Since then, many new sources have come to light. For instance, the Deseret News source goes into quite a decent amount of detail about the TV show.
 * While the subject is borderline notable, that still means it's probably notable. I could just decline or ignore here and I'd have no risk of having my judgement as an AfC reviewer called into question, but that would contribute to the system where it's far too difficult to get anything through AfC.


 * ThanQ for being bold in converting this into mainspace. I have followed it, adding a few small changes along the way (together with other associated similar articles) and I was somewhat dismayed to see the vehemence with which the wiki notability rules were applied to a 'successful' (successful = now series three) television sequence.
 * I submitted for consideration over a year ago (so, during series two) with the edit summary "I now think this is sufficiently referenced and would make a good addition to the project.... One of my refs - which supported pre-existing text - was soon deleted with the rationale that it applied to the ranch article, not the tv series, with the text itself also deleted (I had applied AGF to the previous contribution).
 * Changing slightly to a tangent, The Next One (film) (1984) was established February 2021, starring cult-acress Adrienne Barbeau and not-massively known but not inconsiderable Keir Dullea, after an editor found a hard-published, period source. Without this source, it would've remained as a blacklink in her filmography (added January 2014).
 * This film is almost never shown on UK television; I bought the VHS tape from ebay.com (US) and had it delivered to my brother's Arizona address in (probably) 2013, who brought it to England in his luggage. I put the image on the article, which, as the film is TOOOLD to attract internet reviews, will likely remain as a permastub, but nonetheless a constituent part of the starring actors' bios. This 1984 film is based on the concept of unstable wormhole theory .--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 13:19, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * And also thanks for increasing my Wiki-vocabulary with Ultras; this is particularly applicable in the topics I hang around, with, in decreasing order of proliferation, Indonesian, Malaysian and Thai IPs-with-phones emphasising their respective hero-worship opportunities.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 13:42, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I like looking at articles with several previous declines. Chess (talk) (please use&#32; on reply) 18:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch- Season 3.jpg


 * It looks like a figure intombed inside the mesa leave it alone please 174.161.56.236 (talk) 14:00, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Powering off
I'm curious and was hoping you could help me understand why when gear stops working or shuts down, the cameras that film the show never shut off?? Hoping for a response. rtletourneau@hotmail.com Thank you Robin Johnston 96.52.164.146 (talk) 04:38, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Because this TV show and others like it are entertainment, not science. - LuckyLouie (talk) 12:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Ha ha, I guess that the invisible forces are targeted finitely; reminds me of the future-catastrophe scenaria where they're using horse/cart, when diesels can run mechanically without any electronics.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 23:40, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I too am a little concerned that there is no "Criticisms" section with sourced analysis of the claims made on the television show. Any equipment breakdown, even a just a dead battery, is attributed by the actors to aliens or the government blocking their investigation.  Any photographic, visual, or digital artifact caught in "footage" is assumed to be aliens.  An escaped balloon floating by up in the sky (with no distance reference) or a random light in the sky from a passing plane - must  a UFO.  They spent an episode talking about picking up "mysterious radio signals" at 1.6 GHz - the standard frequency of GPS satellites that blanket the whole planet in those RF signals.  The point is, ALL of the "anomalies" that they describe are ordinary phenomenon, the actors making a lot of hype over nothing burgers.  Even the Skinwalker_Ranch article does a far better job of pointing out the criticisms of the reported "anomalies" that appear to be pure made-up fiction from the former owners attempting to sell the worthless property for a premium price to the current investigators.  The point is, it is just a fictional mockumentary, entertainment suitable for conspiracy theorists and stoners.  T-dot ( Talk/ contribs ) 17:23, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * True, actual critique of the television show is hard to find. Most coverage plays off the sensational angle and treats the claims at face value. One exception is Jason Colavito's review, and this can be summarized in the article text, per WP:PARITY. - LuckyLouie (talk) 15:09, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Colavito has long been considered a self published expert source, so there's no need to deprecate the critique by insinuating its a non notable 'blog post'. However it would be good to have additional sourced analysis, so I've posted a request at the appropriate WikiProject . - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:47, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

COPYVIO
This is a WP:COPYVIO (because it copypastes text from history.com) that I removed. Wikipedia certainly appreciates constructive contributions but please try to compose a neutral summary in your own words and help the encyclopedia avoid plagiarism. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Female Anthropologist / Ranch caretaker
Here are episode credit screenshots on IMDb confirming Kandus Linde has been credited on the show numerous times as an Anthropologist / Caretaker. On the series' official website she is referred to as the "resident anthropologist" besides ranch caretaker with her husband. This refutes the claim in the article that all the experts presented by the show were white men. I believe Ute Tribe members have also appeared in episodes as experts.  5Q5 &#124;&#9993; 14:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
 * This refutes the claim in the article that all the experts presented by the show were white men. Of course an editor highlighting specific show credits to refute the attributed opinion of a source would be WP:OR. It would be different if Wikipedia were stating the CSM opinion as fact. &#45; LuckyLouie (talk) 14:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

5Q5 responds: Here is the full sentence from the article from which my quote excerpt was taken. It didn't read as an opinion to me.

Thanks for revising it to sound a little less like a fact, though on whole, still inaccurate imo. Perhaps the cited source never saw the episodes with Native American experts? I doubt the line with its racial context will last in the article long term, but it won't be me who removes it.  5Q5 &#124;&#9993; 16:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)