Talk:The World of Null-A

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:World A.jpg
Image:World A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

"Critical reception" and van Vogt's response
A. E. Van Vogt reissued "Null-A" in a revised edition. His foreword reveals that the revision was essentially triggered by damon knight's critique. I think that deserves mention, given that so much mileage is given to the critique in the article, but I don' t have my copy of the revised "Null-A" here, so can't add it myself. Help? --Alvestrand (talk) 14:52, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Why is more space devoted to Damon Knight in this article than to the plot of the actual novel? This seems to exhibit a very negative bias on the part of that contributor (a Damon Knight fanboy? Possibly with the initials AF?), especially given the subsequent reviews and evaluations of the book by others in the field. So Damon Knight didn't like the book. BFD. If you look hard enough, you can always find someone who doesn't like ANY particular book. This sounds a lot like sour grapes to me. Jealous much, Damon? In fact, I think the section should be rearranged with the general response to the book appearing before DK's diatribe, so I will do it. Gil gosseyn (talk) 08:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * I completely agree. Who is Damon Knight and why is he even mentioned here? I think it should be removed. This classic book has had a profound impact on my life - it is one of the best sci-fi books I ever read and one that I remember the title and writer of for decades after because of that. I am inclined to say that it did have the most impact on my life of any book as I learned from it the concept of "symantic meaning" (and symantic translation) which has helped me to overcome a very large portion of my autism related social problems in life. Carlo Wood (talk) Carlo Wood (talk) 21:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)