Talk:Tilt.com

June 2013 PROD and tags
Removed an unfounded PROD. Reviewed and determined that this article is well written, referenced with reliable sources and notability easily meets WP:CORPDEPTH. If a user wants to take issue with notability they should bring it to AfD because it certainly doesn't meet PROD or CSD requirements. 190.120.231.41 (talk) 19:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * While it might be notable, it's more an advertisement than an encyclopedia article. --Ronz (talk) 20:38, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Looking closer, it wasn't bad Jun 2013 compared to the mess we have now. --Ronz (talk) 20:41, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Notable campaigns
How about we trim it down to a simple list to start? --Ronz (talk) 16:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * This looks great now. Please let us get this valuable information without having to read unfounded complaints that it looks like an ad. Loveonearth (talk) 17:47, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * As a new editor, dismissing others' concerns is definitely not how to reach any consensus. I've left you a welcome message that highlights many of Wikipedia's most important policies and guidelines.
 * What looks great now? There have been no related changes since the concerns where brought up.
 * It would be of great help to identify who thinks that the information is valuable. From independent and reliable sources that is. Certainly Tilt values the information, but this is not a forum to promote Tilt. --Ronz (talk) 20:21, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I am not with Tilt. I am independent. Yes, what was changed was the annoying blurb about this looking like an ad.  There is no mention here of why this looks like an ad.  I would love to please please PLEASE read about a company without having to first see all these annoying, unfounded "This article appears to be written like an advertisement."  Please explain how this article or this section can be written any more neutral. See Neutral point of view Also please follow Dispute resolution   Please document your concerns. How is this "it's more an advertisement than an encyclopedia article.?" Loveonearth (talk) 15:54, 12 September 2014 (UTC)