Talk:Timashevsky District

Requested move 8 February 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved. 's reasoning does not reflect opposition on this move, rather they are procedurally opposing this request with regards to the earlier RM closure of Timashevsk. The diffs provided by does show some evidence of WP:POINTY. (non-admin closure)   ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   08:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Timashyovsky District → Timashevsky District – WP:CONSISTENCY with recently RM’d article about the eponymous settlement of Timashevsk. See Talk:Timashevsk. —Michael Z. 18:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The proposed spelling is the only one with enough usage to register on Google Ngram. —Michael Z. 18:23, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose, the city should not have been moved to start with. Ymblanter (talk) 14:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You really think the inconsistency would be a better result? Seems WP:POINTY to me, after you used insults to try to influence RMs. —Michael Z. 14:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.