Talk:Titina Silá/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 12:11, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

This looks a very interesting article from Grnrchst (talk). I look forward to assessing to see if it meet the requirements to be a Good Article. simongraham (talk) 12:11, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Comments

 * The article is notable as evidenced by coverage in multiple sources.
 * The article is of reasonable length, with 1,065 words of readable prose.
 * The lead is a reasonable relative length at 169 words.
 * 87.3% of authorship is by Grnrchst, with contributions from 24 other users.
 * It is currently assessed as a B class article.
 * There is no evidence of edit wars.
 * It is consistent with the relevant Manuals of Style.
 * Earwig gives a 52.5% chance of copyright violation with an article online at Afrikan Train. It also gives a 50.7% change of violation with a page produced by the All-African People's Revolutionary Party. The majority of this seems to be a eulogy quoted by all the items. The source given in the article is from a printed in 1979, which predates all three.
 * I note that the reference for this quote is above it rather than at the end. I suggest moving it to the end of the paragraph.
 * Per MOS:BLOCKQUOTE, the source should be appended to the introductory sentence, which is what I have done. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Can you please confirm the term "war heroine" is in the source or amend as WP:GENDER.
 * Neutralised. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Please hyphenate Guinea-Bissau in the lead.
 * Ah whoops, done. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * There is a duplicate link to Portuguese, one in the text and one connected to the translation template. Please remove the latter.
 * Done. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Please remove duplicate links toAmílcar Cabral. Suggest also removing the link to the war of independence in the Legacy section.
 * Done. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The text seems clear and neutral.
 * Add the second comma in "As one of the first women in the PAIGC, she quickly became a popular leading figure in the revolutionary movement and was often praised by its leader, Amílcar Cabral".
 * Done. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I see no other obvious spelling or grammar errors.
 * The infobox image seems appropriate and relevant but is of poor quality. Is there a better one available?
 * Uploaded a better-quality version of the same image. It's in the public domain in Guinea-Bissau, as over 50 years have passed since its creation and the death of its subject. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The images have appropriate CC tags.
 * Spotchecks confirm the sources.
 * There are two very similar items by Urdang listed. Can you please explain.
 * One (1975) is a short journal article, the other (1979) is a book. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The list of Further reading lists Carmen Pereira's entry in rhe Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History. Is this right?
 * This is right, as it talks about Silá in the context of Pereira. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your work on this article. Please take a look at my comments above and ping me when you would like me to take another look. simongraham (talk) 16:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've responded to your comments. Let me know if there's anything else I need to do. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Excellent work. I will start my review now. simongraham (talk) 06:11, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Assessment
The six good article criteria: I believe that this article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.
 * 1) It is reasonable well written.
 * the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
 * it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
 * all inline citations are from reliable sources;
 * it contains no original research;
 * it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism;
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage
 * it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
 * it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
 * 1) It has a neutral point of view.
 * it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
 * images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Pass  simongraham (talk) 06:14, 2 December 2023 (UTC)