Talk:Toxic Beauty

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: The article should be divided into sections. There are no categories at the moment. Also, add a reception section. There are seven reviews at Rotten Tomatoes. You have cited IMDB as a source, note that it isn't a reliable source. Also, there is an infobox for films. The external link is dead. this source is a good one if you want to expand the article. You have nominated the article for DYK, I have fixed all the errors it caused. Note that the ALT1 is kind of misleading hook. Thanks for creating the article..

CAPTAIN MEDUSA  talk  13:11, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

NPOV violation
clear NPOV violations:


 * Toxic Beauty challenges an attitude of silence definitely not neutral


 * documentary that many will find shocking non-neutral


 * It claims that claims is a word to watch


 * naturally unsafe inherently a little confusing, not sure what "naturally unsafe" means

Therapyisgood (talk) 19:22, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Naturally unsafe use. Okay. Don't put talc on your vagina, in such a way that some might find its way inside. At least, don't do it repetitively, or you may find you get an unusual cancer when you are older. It is, I imagine, understandable to want to talcum all over your vagina. I know it can feel nice on your feet when you are putting on a pair of socks. Don't do that. How would you write it?
 * "that many will find shocking"... it's a quote of a review of the movie, not a Wikipedia claim of fact.
 * "Challenges an attitude of silence"... Maybe not, but the fuller story does give evidence of significant attitudes of silence going back half a century, not simply an opinion or suggestion. Don't put talc, on the wet part of your vagina, because there are traces of asbestos in it, and the packaging doesn't say so, even though people know that would be dangerous.
 * "It claims that"... I just tried not to be repetitive. The preceding sentence is... "The film interviews doctors, lawyers, and scientists to explore how products are made..."It claims that thousands of dangerous chemicals..." I thought in this case it seems a natural and non confusing use of the words. I cannot find "it claims that" on WP:WORDSTOWATCH.


 * what say you? ~ R.T.G 10:14, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The only thing I find clearly not-neutral is the "attitude of silence" phrase which I removed, but I also tweaked the very opening sentence of the article--it was tagged as unclear but it also lacked objectivity. I have removed the tag. Drmies (talk) 14:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
 * It follows the sources. J&J for instance was aware of carcinogens for over half a century. ~ R.T.G 20:12, 3 August 2020 (UTC)