Talk:Translation management system

Why only open source?
Having the heading 'Open Source Software solutions' seems strange, when there are no other types or 'Software solutions'. If I see this heading, I would expect to see it in this sort of context: ==Software Solutions== ===Closed Source=== ===Open Source===

Why have the 'only open source links here please' - that sort of thing should probably not be in the main article.

I am going to remove the 'open source' only and make the heading more generic. --Boy.pockets (talk) 11:35, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

As the article mentions, GMS is an outdated term and the article name should be changed to Translation Management System. Also, there should be a redirect from "Globalization Management System" and a mention under the acronym GMS page. It should also be mentioned under the acronym TMS page. Jordibalcells (talk) 12:32, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

I agree with Jordibalcells... I think that's pretty clear, because nobody says "globalization management system" anymore. I see that Jordibalcells made this comment in April 2010, so that's about two years ago.

I actually logged in here to add Wordbee to the list of TMS providers. I use Wordbee, and I think it should be on that list.

So, if nobody minds, I'm going to A) Add Wordbee to that list, B) Change the article per Jordibalcells suggestions. No real changes here since April 2010 isn't too good, so I'll do it. --Robert Rogge (talk) 05:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Move from "Globalization management system" into "Translation management system"
Requested move because there is a redirect and we should add a technical request to Requested moves as described in Moving_a_page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terales (talk • contribs) 17:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)