Talk:Treaty of Campo Formio

Comments
This date thing is a mess.


 * This page gives October 17, 1797
 * 1797 gives September 7 - Treaty of Campo Formio ends the War of the First Coalition.
 * October 27 gives "1797 - Treaty of Campo Formio is signed between France and Austria."

Which date is correct??? --Ante Perkovic 10:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The Treaty of Campo Formio was signed on October 17, 1797. Deucalionite 22:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

It's Campoformio not Campo Formio!!! Pan Brerus (talk) 22:18, 4 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Pan Brerus, the treaty was signed nearby the town that was then called Campo Formio (which later changed the name). "Campo Formio" is the exact form of the name used in the document. Regards, CocoricoPolynesien (talk) 11:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Recent edits
CocoricoPolynesien,

regradless how it is referred by some, it is unevitable that the correspondent party is the Habsburg Monarchy, as I indicated with multiple references, as well the treaty itself, thus my edits were totally accuarate - you like it or not - also after your edits it is still linked to the Habsburg Monarchy.(KIENGIR (talk) 11:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC))


 * 1-No references were ever given.
 * 2-You altered precised information found in the document. That does not qualify as "accurate".
 * Regards - CocoricoPolynesien (talk) 12:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * 1- No, you've got enough clue in the edit log
 * 2- No, that you claim is not written in the document (and I read everything you linked or was available).(KIENGIR (talk) 12:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC))
 * 1-Unsourced claims you make in a edit log have no historic authority, that doesn't work that way. Again, no references were ever given.
 * 2-This is, because if you really had read the full 12 pages of the document, you would have seen it. So, why are you lying ? I can't understand such bad faith...
 * Case closed for me. Regards - CocoricoPolynesien (talk) 13:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I did not lie, read back again if it was not clear: "and I read everything you linked or was available'". Moreover I don't have any bad faith, but unfortunately your continous insults seem like so, as well well in my talk page, so you'll get warned for incivility.(KIENGIR (talk) 13:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC))
 * No insults were exchanged. You may stop making unfounded claims and restrain to use unrelated notices on others talk pages. You are not objective enough to do so. This thread is no longer related to the Treaty and should stop. Regards - CocoricoPolynesien (talk) 14:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * ?? It would be enough objective to accuse me continously? Sorry, here is the diff, read please WP:Civility. I did not deteriorate from the topic, it seems you did with you continous accusations as well in my talk page, even don't know why you started discussions there, that would belong here.(KIENGIR (talk) 14:28, 22 August 2019 (UTC))