Talk:Treaty of Ripon

Assessment Review
Might be worth reading the articles on Covenanters and Bishops Wars in more detail (fill out background - no reason why you can't copy bits you need :)).

Infobox on Treaty - there's a lot missing (have a look at Treaty_of_Compiègne_(1624) for example).

Negotiations - no mention of the widely advertised connection between Charles' opponents in Parliament and the Scots. The whole point of the occupation was to ensure Charles had to keep Parliament in being and they co-ordinated closely with the Scots.

Terms' seems a bit light.

Note date usage (6 November or 6th) and picture format.

The connection between the Treaty of London and this treaty is not clear. You refer to the 'religious dispute' - what is it, a nd how does it relate to the £300k paid by Parliament?

Good stuff. Robinvp11 (talk) 17:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestions :) I have attempted to address your comments, can you let me know what you think? In relation to the Terms section, I agree there is not much information here, but I'm not sure what else to add, beyond a line about the terms being humiliating for Charles. The mention of a religious dispute within the Terms section I agree was confusing, and I have removed this as this section already states the dispute was to be resolved with the Parliament of England.--CSJJ104 (talk) 22:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Me again. As an FYI I have nominated this for a DYK here. Please feel free to suggest hooks or otherwise comment as you feel appropriate. CSJJ104 (talk) 19:22, 15 September 2020 (UTC)