Talk:Treehouse of Horror VI/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Two quick things:

Homer3:
 * You use both "3D" and "3-D" in this article. Please choose one and change the others to reflect it, for continuity sake.
 * Fixed one "3-D", the other is a quote.
 * "Homer falls into the hole as the universe collapses on itself but Bart ends up back in the house thanks to his safety." I don't understand this. "Thanks to his safety?" Can you reword?
 * A key word was accidentally cut out of that, it should be "thanks to his safey rope". Fixed.

--Hunter Kahn (talk) 01:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for taking a look. If you don't mind, could you also review Nancy Cartwright? I'm trying to have it to FAC by the end of the month and a GAC review would be immensely helpful. I'd be willing to review an article for you in exchange. Thanks, Scorpion 0422  22:31, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

A good article is:
 * 1) Well-written: Prose is good, MOS is good.
 * 2) Factually accurate and verifiable: Sources are good, no original research.
 * 3) Broad in its coverage: Covers main aspects, no unneeded detail.
 * 4) Neutral: Yes.
 * 5) Stable: Yes.
 * 6) Illustrated, if possible, by images: Yes.

--Hunter Kahn (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)