Talk:Trump Model Management

Untitled
Hello all - in this document there is a section that says

''Trump Model Management will continue to search for the freshest faces and maintain its outstanding client relations. Representing international stars Lisa Cant, Hye Park and newcomer Siri Tollerod, beauty pageant winner Dayana Mendoza, and superstars Isabella Rossellini, Tatjana Patitz. Trump Models holds its competitive edge in the fashion industry amongst the industry giants.''

It feels to me like Corporate Communication Speak. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.202.198.44 (talk • contribs) 07:00, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Investigative journalist article released.
"Former Models for Donald Trump's Agency Say They Violated Immigration Rules and Worked Illegally: "It's like modern-day slavery."

by James West Aug. 30, 2016 12:07 PM

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/08/donald-trump-model-management-illegal-immigration

Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 07:15, 31 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I removed the above ref and one other ( http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/09/01/seth-meyers-blasts-trump-s-modeling-scandal-calls-trump-the-law-order-svu-candidate.html ) from the article, since there's currently nothing included about this issue. Parking them here on the talk page against future use seems reasonable.--NapoliRoma (talk) 22:40, 3 September 2016 (UTC)


 * NapoliRoma - I didn't add any references to the article. I just read The Daily Beast article to which you provided the link. Thank you. I only posted the link to the original research article from Mother Jones above in my Talk post. If you want to see who added the references, you could try looking at the article's "View history" tab. Yours, Wordreader (talk) 23:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I may have been confusing here.
 * A single-edit IP deleted your original comment here, so I restored it. Meanwhile, I noticed that yet another editor had added two refs to the article (one of them being the same MoJo article that you noted), although there was nothing for those refs to support (these refs were added even before you added your comment to this talk page, in case it matters).
 * So, I deleted those refs from the article, and a reply to your comment seemed like an easy way to park the second ref, since the first one was already there.
 * Since your comment had been zapped once, I tossed in some verbiage to point out that your comment (and mine) belong here on the talk page.
 * Hope this makes more (or any) sense. Regards, NapoliRoma (talk) 01:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much, NapoliRoma. I didn't understand what happened. I got the notice that there was a change and saw your first reply. Meanwhile, regarding the vandalization of my post by persons unknown, may I add "hmmmmm"? Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 02:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Ongoing discussion about lead picture at Donald Trump
You are invited to participate in an ongoing talk-page discussion about the lead picture at Donald Trump. --Dervorguilla (talk) 06:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Underage sex trafficking allegations
Please fact check the sources in. EllenCT (talk) 07:09, 8 July 2019 (UTC)