Talk:Turbo C++

Untitled
Please add a screenshot of Turbo C++ 2006.

The old screenshot may cause readers to instantly depart without realizing the current version offers a modern GUI.

I disagree with this anonymous request for two reasons:


 * 1) Turbo C++ is, franklopment tool of the early 90s than it is today.
 * 2) The historical screen shots are more important in showing the software in its prime, which many users may have never seen, don't have, or can't run - anyone who wants to can download and run the modern TC++.

Of course, I use Linux exclusively now and couldn't do a screen shot of TC++ if I wanted to. Scott1329m 12:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't think there is a rule against multiple screenshots. Include both historical and current screens, with appropriate captions. VanishingUser 01:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Umm...was there really a "Turbo C++ 4.0"? I remember Turbo C++ 3.1 (Windows) and 4.5 (Windows), but I thought 4.0 was strictly a Borland C++ release. 12 March 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.14.141.69 (talk) 15:41, 12 March 2008 (UTC) happy lng naman ako sa pag ti2ngin d2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.201.117.102 (talk) 11:09, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Codeplex Version
Has https://turboc.codeplex.com/ this anything to do with Borland's version? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andwan0 (talk • contribs) 22:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * This is a link to pirated software. Yes, it looks to be Turbo C++, but for obvious reasons, we can't include the link in the article. --Yamla (talk) 01:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Program
Void main { Clrscr; Int a,b,c,d; Cout<<"enter the numbers"<>a>>b; C=a+b; Cout<<" the sum of these numbers is:"<
 * 2) include
 * 3) include


 * This is not a valid C++ program, nor would it be an appropriate use of the talk page even if it was. --Yamla (talk) 15:31, 19 November 2017 (UTC)