Talk:Umm Safa

Guerin problem
Ok, so Socin p. 156  gives Guerin, 1869, p. 39, Kefr Achoua for this place. (visiting 1863)

However, both Dauphin and Finkelstein gives Guerin, 1875, p. 109, Oumm Saffa! (visiting 1870)

Actually, I suspect they are all correct.....and that Guerin wrote about the same place twice...under two different names... (who said this was going to be easy...) Huldra (talk) 21:55, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking this up. At a rush this morning, the two texts more or less run thus:-
 * Guérin 1869 p.39
 * (1)From the summit of this same plateau, my guide pointed out another small village to me, located about 3 kilometres to the north and called Kfar Achoua’. de Saucey mentioned this site under the name of Kafr Aissoua(? Small print, hard to read), drawing attention to the book of Nehemiah’s mention of a  village, called Iechoua (?) that had been converted into a Rechabite one by the children of Judea  after the captivity. The name Iechoua is identical to thart of Achoua. But this village, as that learned man correctly observed, could not have occupied the site of the village we are dealing with here. That is to say, that It must be located  within  the tribe of Judah, and probably to the south of this tribe, to gather from the names of other villages in the midst of which this one is included. In any case, the name Achoua is certainly of ancient provenance. The village which bears this name  took the place, undoubtedly, of a village or small town with this same name.

(2) Guerin, 1875, p. 109
 * At 12:16 we climbed the hill on the top of which the village of Umm Safa lies (occupied by the village . ., literally) It contains 300 inhabitants. It must go back to an ancient site as is shown by the materials used in the building of some houses and several columnar sections scattered about the ground. A copious spring, called Ain Umm Safa, provides the villagers  with water. They venerate, under a koubbeh, the remains of Nabi Haman.
 * Notes
 * I'm not sure I read Haman correctly. I can't seem to get my computer to zoom into the text. The name suggests of course a 'prophet' i.e. sheikh, of this name. Cf. On a Nabī Ḥānūn or local sheikh turned into a saint, in the village of Beit Ḥānūn, north of Gaza  see Moshe Sharon, Corpus Inscriptionum Arabicarum Palaestinae (CIAP) Volume Two: B-C BRILL, 1997  p.98
 * On koubbeh:-
 * "The name of the northernmost of this southern group is Koubbeh, probably from having a saint’s tomb with a dome on it, for that the name in Arabic implies.James Silk Buckingham Travels in Assyria, Media, and Persia, H. Colburn, 1830 p.316"
 * I've bookmarked this, and look forward to being a tad more helpful than this pittance suggests. Cheers.Nishidani (talk) 08:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * User:Nishidani, thanks a lot! Also, at least on my Safari, there is are small - and + signs on the top right side of the page, which you can use to decrease/increase the font size. (The original size is always too small for me to read..) And I believe koubbeh is supposed to be covered under Qubba (though that article could do with some expansion.) And I am really not sure when it is called a   Qubba, and when it is called a Maqam, Huldra (talk) 21:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * That's easily got round. Link Koubbeh to Qubba and add, 'what Guerin (1875) described as a.. I.e. 'They venerate  the remains of Nabi Haman under what Guérin described as a  Koubbeh.'Nishidani (talk) 10:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Desert Mounted Corps
Checking "what links here", brought me to Desert Mounted Corps, and the source there is Preston, 1921, p. 110, in



However, I cannot find anything about Umm Safa on that page ...or anywhere else in the book for that matter. What am I missing? Huldra (talk) 21:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I downloaded Preston's book and have read two chapters dealing with the south of that area so far. I note that he mentions a village called Suffa in the context of troop formations driving north from Beit Ur al-Tahta (p.114).
 * "The brigade then attacked the village of Suffa, which was full of enemy troops, in order to try and relieve the pressure on the left of the Yeomanry Division, but the Turks were found in too great strength to be dislodged. Fortunately, however, they made no further attempt to penetrate through the gap, probably because they were really unaware of its existence. Positions on both sides were exceedingly ill-defined, owing to the impossibility of digging trenches in the solid rock, of which most of the hill and ridge tops were composed. Very heavy fighting continued throughout the day, but the enemy, though continually reinforced, was unable to break our line."
 * It seems close because the military account talks of the difficulty of hill terrain in that area. Nishidani (talk) 12:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, User:Nishidani, That is clearly Saffa, Ramallah; close by Beit Ur al-Tahta and Beit Ur al-Fauqa (which are all mentioned). One day I will sit down with maps...and go through all of those WWI articles and get the locations right.... I have done some (typically: lots of the linked names   started out just as a redir  to "Gaza" or "Judea")..but there are still tons of mistakes there ...even in articles which have GA status....oh, well, Huldra (talk) 22:00, 27 June 2018 (UTC) (PS, actually, it is normally not that difficult to decipher the name...almost all of the English literature of the time closely follow the names used on the SWP maps! Seriously...)
 * Yeah I twigged that would be the case, but being a dumbo here in the presence of a topological maestro (maestro) I trusted you'd figure it out. That's why, despite everything, I like Wikipedia. There are a lot of people who actually know the topics more than those who provide us with sources! Nishidani (talk) 07:31, 29 June 2018 (UTC)