Talk:Unity Trust Bank

Irrelevant and promotional content
The entire products section is based on tbe bank's own press releases and, consequently, unduly promotional. Just to give the most egregious example: "giving organisations a greater level of spending control" - greater than what? Who compared those levels of spending control and concluded Unity Trust Bank's is greater? Oh right, themselves... An encyclopedia article is not a product directory. If no independent source has bothered to discuss the bank's product mix, it's apparently not significant information. Another issue is the second half of the "history" section. That's entirely off-topic and discusses an unrelated organization that happens to share the name. I have no opinion on whether the 19th-century bank is notable; whether or not it is, information on an unrelated bank does not belong in the article on this bank. For these reasons I will again remove the content in question. Huon (talk) 20:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Drchriswilliams just did so. Huon (talk) 20:44, 4 November 2016 (UTC)