Talk:Urokinase

Untitled
I moved the receptor to its own page

Not this absurd 'first' again!
Why do authors insist on writing this drivel? It was not 'first' discovered in 1947, it was discovered in 1947. It was discovered ONCE ONLY, not a first time and a second time (or whatever). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 15:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Yep, the "first" has been deleted now. EMsmile (talk) 14:26, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Edit links not placed correctly
I know this is a minor issue, but I noticed the edit boxes are appearing in the wrong place on this page - could it be something to do with the infoboxes' code? I note the first two boxes appear after the first infobox, at least for my browser (Firefox 2.0.0.17) and resolution (1440x900) --Rogerb67 (talk) 14:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Merge proposal
This seems to be the same as PLAU (plasminogen activator, urokinase). I'm not sure how to merge this without messing up all the infoboxes. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 10:26, 31 January 2010 (UTC) I agree with this merge proposal, but am also unsure of the best way in which to do this without messing it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nexxen (talk • contribs) 04:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)


 * In my opinion, it would be wrong to merge these articles, Urokinase and PLAU. This article outlines a class of enzymes (EC 3.4.21.73), while the article PLAU has a focus on a specific human gene product, PLAU, from that class. --Dcirovic (talk) 20:39, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Eureka?
So when was it discovered? TREKphiler  any time you're ready, Uhura  13:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Link to gene
I agree that the two pages should be merged, but if not at least a link to PLAU is in order. Gon-no-suke (talk) 05:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Industrial production
Could someone please add information how it is nowadays produced industrially? It says that it was produced from urine - is this still the main way of producing this? If so, who collects the urine and where?