Talk:Verbesina occidentalis

Review
This article is a mess get your stuff together!!!

Peer Review
First off, the previous comment left was quite unprofessional and certainly not a positive contribution to this talk page. That being said, I liked the amount of detail you were able to put into your "Control" section, considering that it was a header you created yourself. I also feel you did well in the "Uses" section, presenting your facts in a nonbiased way. Nevertheless, I would highly suggest you heavily edit your "Control" section, because, while the information is certainly helpful, I feel that the sources from which the information was derived have to be better summarized, as it currently reads more like reiterating the results of study than a summary of information related to the subject matter at-hand. Likewise, in accordance with the assignment criteria, you may want to consider breaking your "description and habitat" section into two separate sections: "Description" and "Distribution and habitat". This would be the most important way to improve the structure of your article. Additionally, in your "Ecology" section, you do not need to necessarily explain the ecological terms you use (e.g. Shannon diversity index and Evenness); the reader of an article such as this should already understand what these terms mean and/or you could enter them into your article in the form of a hyperlink that takes the reader to the wiki page for the term, simply by clicking on the word in your article. Further, I would suggest that you include a bit more information on taxonomy if possible. Lastly, I found it helpful seeing the amount of references you had, as I may now seek to find more references for my own article to ensure that it is nonbiased and thorough with a wide variety of factual evidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nfrotten17 (talk • contribs) 05:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Make sure you capitalize the first letter of the headers.Isoetid (talk) 20:53, 21 November 2016 (UTC)