Talk:Vetus Latina manuscripts

Some remarks
Veverve (talk) 13:34, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Why are many items in the New Testament list unsourced by an inline ref?
 * 2) Why is the Oxford Vulgate, which is an edition of the Vulgate, included in the list of NT Vetus Latina editions?


 * Hi Veverve, good that you mention it. These are leftovers from the old List of New Testament Latin manuscripts that I haven't fixed yet. I've removed the Oxford Vulgate, I'll work on verifying the NT items on the list (it's a bit of a tedious task that I hadn't finished yet). Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 13:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * nice job! However, I note that there are still unsourced lines in the "New Testament" section. Veverve (talk) 18:55, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * do you intend to fix this? Veverve (talk) 04:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I do, but not all in one go. As I said, it's a bit of a tedious task. Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 13:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * have you managed to find sources for the claims, or can I removed them? Veverve (talk) 18:58, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I checked all entries of Piggin 2019, "Beuron Numbers of 1949". Some of these may well be out of date, but it's the best overview I could find. Some of the unsourced claims may be true, but they are simply not found in Piggin 2019. If you want, or someone else wants, they can try to look these sources up. Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 20:41, 23 December 2022 (UTC)