Talk:Vicky Kaushal/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 04:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

I will review this article, thank you. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 04:52, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * "Aspiring to a career in films" — Can be rephrased as "Aspiring to take up a career in film".
 * "His father was keen on his son having a stable career" — As an engineer or any other position in the film industry.
 * Most likely as an engineer, but the source doesn't explicitly mention it. I therefore wrote that he "thus pursued an engineering degree" later in the sentence. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Does any source mention Laal Pencil's genre?
 * Nope, couldn't find any mention of it. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Perhaps a wikilink to "stammering" in case readers don't quite get the meaning at first.
 * , thanks for the comments. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Sources
 * Wikilink the publishers/newspapers/websites for ref nos 1 to 7.
 * NDTV, Rediff.com, Box Office India, Film Companion, RajeevMasand.com shouldn't be in italics.
 * Wikilink the publishers/newspapers/websites for ref nos 10, 11 and 12.
 * Wikilink NDTV and The Hindu in ref nos 15 and 16 respectively.
 * Wikilink Variety in ref no 20.
 * Remove the wikilink for ref no 24 (Firspost) coz there are other Firstpost references before it.
 * Wikilink Business Standard, India Today, Bollywood Hungama, Mid Day
 * Remove the wikilink for ref no 30 (NDTV) coz there are other NDTV references before it.
 * Remove the wikilink for ref no 38 (Filmfare) coz there are other Filmfare references before it.

That's about it from me. Resolve the remaining comments and the article is passed. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:26, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * , all done. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Thank you for addressing my comments,. Congratulations, the article has passed. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:01, 7 April 2019 (UTC)