Talk:Waddesdon Bequest


 * 27,554 + 4,587 views on main page day in 2016
 * 34,872 + 5575 on main page day in 2023

Typo?
In the Fakes section "is a two-handled agate wase with Renaissance-style metal mounts" ... is "vase" meant instead of "wase"? Ealdgyth - Talk 22:26, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, ta Johnbod (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Waddesdon Bequest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150612173841/http://blog.britishmuseum.org/2015/06/12/a-rothschild-renaissance-reimagining-the-waddesdon-bequest/ to http://blog.britishmuseum.org/2015/06/12/a-rothschild-renaissance-reimagining-the-waddesdon-bequest/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Thornton 2011
Six cites to Thornton 2011 in Notes; no such reference in bibliography (tho there's a 2001). ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 23:59, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Superb- a question
Hello, I enjoyed reading today's FA, especially loved the photographs. Just wanted to ask a question. I noticed objects are described as "superbly executed", "rather ostentatious", "of superb quality", etc etc, in what I perceived as wikivoice. I assume it's not a problem considering this is an FA, but I'd like to learn why. I thought we had to directly quote critics for such statements, and make it clear whose view we are reflecting. Thanks in advance. JohnmgKing (talk) 11:03, 3 March 2023 (UTC)