Talk:Wanda E. Brunstetter

Maintenance Templates
Where does the crap "close connection" bias come from? Whoever put that there doesn't know who I am. How could they possibly know if I did or didn't have a "close connection" with the subject? For the record, I don't. Just because I am invested in creating this page doesn't mean that I am biased toward her. I just think that a person who has written almost 90 books and is sold at major retailers deserves a wikipedia page. Jolinda42 (talk) 04:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Jolinda42Jolinda42 (talk) 04:38, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * No-one "deserves" an entry in Wikpedia. We include articles on subjects that are notable - please read the golden rule. Flat Out (talk) 05:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * And she does have "significant coverage" in "reliable sources" that are "independent" of the topic. For the record, I am "not" arguing that she is notable. This is not an argument. It is a fact. I am arguing that whoever put the note about how my article is faulty because of a possible "close connection" with the subject is full of crap. Where do they get off assuming they know who I even am? Jolinda42 (talk) 05:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Jolinda42Jolinda42 (talk) 05:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * We all have to provide evidence of notability. In this particular case, not many sources independent of the subject appear to have written about her. Also, nobody owns an article. Flat Out (talk) 05:37, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. Now I know you're just trying to be annoying on purpose. I give up. If you're not going to read my entire post, please don't bother responding to half. Thank you and good night. Jolinda42 (talk) 05:41, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Jolinda42Jolinda42 (talk) 05:41, 15 May 2017 (UTC)