Talk:Wendy Savage

2017 section
If editing please link to the appropriate article for a citation. An editor attempted to change the paragraph on Ms Savage's opinions on terminations without linking to the article from the Independent which was given as the reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1968peterbishop (talk • contribs) 20:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * We've now ended up with a very long section on this year, but very little on Prof Savage's extensive and significant career previously! Perhaps we could trim the new section, or at least focus on doing more on the rest of the article? Bondegezou (talk) 13:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Good point. Indeed while I sought to improve the section, and thereby contributed to making it longer, I am not sure that the section actually adds much at all. Especially as it involves a mail on Sunday article, which I see that Prof. Savage has complained mis represents her views....see "Interview with Professor Wendy Savage – a response to the Mail on Sunday" Daithidebarra (talk) 16:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I have come to the view that the entire section is a storm in a teacup and could be dumped. Bondegezou (talk) 10:59, 24 March 2017 (UTC)