Talk:Wendy Wright

Source on modus operandi, arguments and style
The seven part "Richard Dawkins Interviews Creationist Wendy Wright (eg Richard Dawkins Interviews Creationist Wendy Wright (Part 4/7))is highly insightful. Are there any other sources on the lady? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.178.101.241 (talk) 04:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Sentence moved to Talk, because episode represented is incomplete
The following sentence, of an event in 1991 regarding an "arrest order," begs the question of the disposition of the case. The sentence should not be returned until the outcome of the matter—dismissal, conviction, etc.—is researched and determined, and can be stated from a source:"Wright's name was listed in a court-issued arrest order in 1991 after failing to post a peace bond following an abortion protest that turned violent in Wichita, Kansas."

Otherwise, the sentence is suggestive of facts, and not factual, and in its incompleteness regarding an event of 25 years ago, is not encyclopedic. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 19:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Added Undue tag
…because having 60% of citations and text regarding a single event in which the title subject participated, eight years ago—was "Recentism" in 2008-2009, and now is simply Undue (relative to the statements of power and influence made in the first paragraph). Find other things to write about, relevant to her notability (scorn from Dawkins is barely relevant), or redact the second paragraph to a sentence. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 20:01, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Pop atheist?
What is a pop atheist? Isn't it a bit derogatory for Richard Dawkins? — Anry.kiknavelidze (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)