Talk:White-eyed river martin

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 4, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Check
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Check
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Check
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Check
 * 5. Article stability? Check
 * 6. Images?: Check

Well written. Nothing to say, quite excellent in my opinion. :) If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.  Rt . 15:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Legal status
The article already mentions that the species is protected under the CITES Appendix 1. This is locally applied through its designation as a reserved wild animal species. under the Wild Animal Reservation and Protection Act, BE 2535. This could be mentioned in the article. --Paul_012 (talk) 06:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Photo
I've uploaded a photo I took of one of the specimens at Chulalongkorn University. I'll leave it to the article's regular contributors to decide how best it should be used. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, Paul, I didn't expect ever to get an image of the actual bird  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:46, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 one external links on White-eyed river martin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.orientalbirdclub.org/publications/forktail/2pdfs/Dickinson-White-eyedRiver-Martin.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.orientalbirdclub.org/publications/forktail/3pdfs/Parkes-White-eyedRiverMartin.pdf
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://orientalbirdclub.org/publications/bullfeats/eyedmart.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.orientalbirdclub.org/publications/bullfeats/eyedmar2.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbd.int/programmes/areas/water/toolkit/html/1.9.6a_threatened_southeast.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.worldbirdnames.org/n-warblers.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 21:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Edit summary
, no, just my stupidity. Not picked up at FAC either... Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok, knowing your careful editing, I was worried that I might have been in error. Shyamal (talk) 05:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Main drawing
This stylised drawing of the bird is very inappropriate as the main illustration of this bird. Is there no scientific drawing/accurate drawing, or clear photo that can be used? The stylised drawing is more like a logo. 81.147.167.25 (talk) 08:45, 31 July 2021 (UTC)