Talk:Wrigley Field renovations

Requests for advice
@ User Go Phightins! I created a new article, Wrigley Field renovations. Can you take a look and tell me what you think? Should I add some categories? Baseball? Chicago? Stuff like that. Thanks. ```Buster Seven   Talk  23:03, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey . Sorry for the delay. Overall, I would say that the article is pretty good ... I am a little concerned, though, at the scope/title thereof. Are you focusing solely on renovations since the Ricketts family purchased the team? If so, I am not sure that the title should be what it is -- perhaps the specific phase of renovations. Secondarily, I think a better title would be Renovations at Wrigley Field -- it sounds more compliant with the MOS (not sure, just a guess -- perhaps we could start a discussion at WT:BASEBALL on the name and for some additional feedback). I am unfamiliar with other similar articles, so you might get to "write the book" on them :-). Good start; I would seek additional feedback at the aforementioned talk page if I were you; I am rather unversed in how we write articles on stadiums and such.  Go  Phightins  !  02:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)


 * A few administrative points: I noticed that some text matches or is very close to text in Wrigley Field. I recommend having a look at Copying within Wikipedia to see how to provide appropriate attribution for text copied from another article. As this article is a spin-out from the Wrigley Field article, at some point you should put at the start of the "Renovation" section in the Wrigley Field article. Note that article titles and section headings should follow sentence case, so "renovations" should be lower case in the article title, and similar modifications should be made to various section headings. I think "Wrigley Field renovations" is fine as a title; putting Wrigley first gives it more emphasis and would place it in a more natural location when sorted alphabetically in a list. There may be some resistance to having a spin-out article, but I think there should be sufficient significant information on the construction process to warrant it, particularly if the article is kept up-to-date. Happy writing! isaacl (talk) 03:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * One other style issue. MOS says no wikilinks in section headers.  I like the subject.  You rock, . John from Idegon (talk) 03:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks, my friends, so much for all the replies and suggestions. I welcome all your advice and will make the changes soon. @ GoP...Yes, the article is only about the current on-going renovations that will take 4 years to complete. Any helpful discussion at Baseball would be great. @ Isaacl...Yes, I did "lift" from the Wrigley Field article to get some "meat on the bones" and the references that came with. I will make the changes you suggest. @John...Thanks, I'll make that change too. Also, I am going to cut and paste this discussion to the article talk page. Right now I am using it (the talk page) as a notebook of sorts. ```Buster Seven   Talk  05:55, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

The famous trough urinals
Yes, gentlemen, there is good news. The troughs will stay. Why should future young Cubs fans be deprived of that special fragrance that only 75,000 plus male Cubs fans can create? 75000? Simple math.... approximately 25000 males in attendance + 3 trips to the "john" for each = 75000. I'm not sure how to add this little nugget of info into the article. Any ideas? Buster Seven   Talk  20:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC) Re-signed for added thought. Buster Seven   Talk  23:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

COI
ICON Venue Group is listed as providing time management for this project. The company is actually the Project Manager. (This edit request was made by IP acct 50.194.129.105)
 * ✅ Buster Seven   Talk  07:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://espn.go.com/blog/chicago/jon-greenberg/post/_/id/530/statues-relocated-during-wrigley-construction and other sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

copyvio
The primary focus of the first phase of The 1060 Project (completed in 2015) was structural work to prepare Wrigley Field for enhancements and improvements over the course of the construction plan. Another focus was expanding and improving the left- and right-field bleachers, as well new outfield signs.Overseeing the project is Carl Rice, vice president of the Wrigley Field restoration and expansion — a role he took on in July 2015 (he was previously vice president, ballpark operations). Three pillars of the project are historic preservation, connectivity/technology, and sustainability. And during a recent press tour of the stadium, Rice described The 1060 Project as “bringing the ballpark into the future… without changing a thing.”

Compares to

Earliest stages of the 1060 Project plan included structural work to prepare the stadium for enhancements and improvements over the 5-year term of the construction process; specifically, improved player facilities, new fan amenities, outfield signage, expanded concessions, new and improved restroom facilities and the improvement and expansion of the left and right field bleachers. The basic and on-going concepts of the project are historic preservation, connectivity/technology, and sustainability. Carl Rice, vice president of restoration and expansion, described the project as "bringing the ballpark into the future...without changing a thing." Which is a tad much. Collect (talk) 18:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Photo requests
Just a suggestion: is there a possibility that one or more of the photographers who share with the blog www.bleedcubbieblue.com might share here? They have been generous there, and as thorough in their documentation of the changes as public citizens can be.