Talk:You Don't Miss Your Water

Triffids version is excessive without rationale
Why is this section so detailed? Neither Bell’s version sees such treatment re: details, nor does the Triffid’s own page devote much more than a single line. I don’t mind this as I believe more info is better contrary to several Wikipedia policies. Regardless, if some reasoning were added here why the Triffid’s version deserves the exposure, then I can see that being helpful to understand why the detail lends an air of importance that is otherwise not supported currently. WPGuin (talk) 04:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I kind of agree. I think the text about the Triffids' version should be trimmed down and incorporated into the preceeding "Cover versions" sub-section. Lose the Infobox and release track listing too, as I don't see that it's notable enough to warrant those. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 17:52, 7 November 2022 (UTC)