Template:Did you know nominations/2013 Quaid-e-Azam Residency attack

Nominated article posterd to ITN on June 18, 2013.

2013 Quaid-e-Azam Residency attack

 * ... that the Quaid-e-Azam Residency (pictured), a heritage site in Ziarat, Pakistan, was badly damaged in an attack by BLA terrorists on June 15?
 * Reviewed: Kai Holst

Created/expanded by Faizan (talk). Self nominated at 13:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC).


 * Symbol confirmed.svg Good enough, notable enough and rivetting enough. No issue, should go ahead. — Шαмıq ☪   тαʟκ✍ @ 14:25, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Symbol possible vote.svg Article has not been created or expanded 5x within the past 10 days -sarvajna (talk) 08:22, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Which article you are talking about? We are concerned with 2013 Quaid-e-Azam Residency attack here. It was created on June 16, 2013. Ok? Fai  zan  08:40, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Article moved from User:Faizan/2013 Quaid-e-Azam Residency attack on June 16, 2013
 * Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 38 edits ago on June 16, 2013 Fai  zan  08:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Ya, that part is fine. -- Tito ☸ Dutta 09:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, had checked the article Quaid-e-Azam Residency .-sarvajna (talk) 09:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Good to go? Can expect a tick? Any other service? Fai  zan  09:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a really important event, try WP:ITN -- Tito ☸ Dutta 09:44, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * See these -- Tito ☸ Dutta 09:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I am fixing copyvio issues for less confidence. Tito can you help me out with the ITN? Please. Fai  zan  10:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The ITN part is being discussed at my talk page. I did not check the copyvio issue carefully, but seeing the initial report, I felt there might be some issues. -- Tito ☸ Dutta 10:39, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Working on Copyvio issues. Fai  zan  10:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Replied below. Fai  zan  11:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: Do we even need a separate article for the attack when the house article itself has like less than 10 sentences? §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 10:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, the house article will have no effect on the terrorist incident. Fai  zan  10:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Ofcourse! An article on wikipedia will hardly have effect on the terrorist attacks happening in real world. What i meant was that there is no need of two different article. The attack-article should be merged with the house article. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 10:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Please Dharma. Both articles have gathered enough coverage, and I am working on them. You are welcome to start a merge proposal. Fai  zan  10:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If i start a merge proposal, the article will not go on main page, in DYK or ITN, until the merger discussion concludes. The discussion will go on for very long and then it will have no chance of ITN as the news will be stale by then. For merged article, there are different rules of DYK for calculating expansion. I have not done that anytime but maybe Tito knows how that is assessed. Pick is your. You and other major contributors of the article can have a informal merge discussion and boldly merge the two article without long-lasting-formal discussion. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 11:00, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Let it be listed at the main page. I don't really think there is a need to merge. The home article is itself important, and the article covering the incident is too. The home article needs expansion, no doubt, but this should not result in sacrifice of another article. I don't know why the home article did not undergo expansion. But don't worry, things will be fine there. Fai  zan  11:04, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, a merge proposal will delay both ITN and DYK. I feel ITN will either be rejected or pass marginally. I have added 2 citation needed templates. I am seeing few WikiProject Pakistan DYKs are being quickpassed these days. It was one of those. If a reviewer overlooks a minor typo or a minor DMY, MDY issue, that does not matter very much, but, issue like copyvio/close paraphrasing are important. -- Tito ☸ Dutta 11:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, sure, I am trying my best to get it passed. Have added citations, and am fixing copy vios. And I will expect cooperation. Fai  zan  11:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The copyvio issues have been addressed, and now 0.0% confidence of a violation is there by the tool. Fai  zan  11:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Also the article is under nomination at WP:ITN here. Fai  zan  11:46, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Article has now been posted on ITN. --ThaddeusB (talk) 22:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)