Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Głębokie


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:20, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Battle of Głębokie

 * ... that the Battle of Głębokie during the Polish-Soviet War was less decisive than the Soviets hoped for? Source:  Piłsudski, pp. 46–53
 * ALT1:... that the Battle of Głębokie during the Polish-Soviet War was both a tactical victory and a strategic defeat for the Soviet side ? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
 * Reviewed: Thomas Forrest Cotton

Created by Halibutt (talk). Nominated by Piotrus (talk) at 10:52, 28 February 2018 (UTC).


 * New enough (moved to Mainspace Feb 28). Long enough. AGF on sourcing - whole article is cited by 19 pages from two books in Polish. QPQ is done. Hook is appropriate length. The hook is NOT sourced within the article, where the words "decisive" and "hope" are not used. This appears to be based on the first sentence in the Outcome section?, how would you feel about adjusting it to "that the Battle of Głębokie during the Polish-Soviet War was a tactical victory for the Russian side, but was a strategic defeat?" Argento Surfer (talk) 18:05, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I've added a slightly modified version of this hook as ALT1 above. Is it ok? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Symbol voting keep.svg Alt 1 is good to go. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:59, 2 March 2018 (UTC)