Template:Did you know nominations/Chirand
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 00:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Chirand[edit]
[[File:|120x133px|Kushan period coins ]]
Kushan period coins
- ... that the archaeological finds reported from Chirand are from the Neolithic, Chalcolithic and iron age periods including a cache of 88 Kushan period coins (pictured)?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Army and Navy Union of the United States of America
- Comment: Moved from usage page on 3 January 2016
5x expanded by Nvvchar (talk). Self-nominated at 07:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC).
I have done a lot of cleanup in the article. It is a good effort and neutral; the article is of a good length and content, no copyright issues, the citations are reliable, the hook has been verified using appropriate sources. But I noticed a few confusing parts :
- ...with probability of an era period of 1755+155 BC What is 1755+155?
- Use any one of "Period I, II, III" or "Phase I, II, III" consistently throughout the article. Sainsf <^>Talk all words 03:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Sainsf Thanks for the review. The "era period of 1755+155 BC" stands corrected. Mention of "Periods" is maintained uniformly, and over links have been removed.Nvvchar. 13:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Very well, then. All issues are resolved. This nomination is now eligible for DYK. Sainsf <^>Talk all words 15:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
