Template:Did you know nominations/K. B. Sainis


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 16:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

K. B. Sainis

 * ... that K. B. Sainis sat in the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) at its Indian representative? Source: Profile on UNSCEAR
 * ALT1:... that K. B. Sainis presided the Standing Advisory Group on Nuclear Applications (SAGNA) of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 2012? Source: Profile on UNSCEAR, Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: Sources
 * ALT2 (reviewer-proposed) ... that K. B. Sainis is the Indian representative to the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR)? Source: Profile on UNSCEAR
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/James D. Wright

Created by Tachs (talk). Self-nominated at 14:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Long enough, new enough, written in a neutral manner and no copyvio detected. Hook is okay, however I porpose ALT2 (a modification of the original proposal) because it is present tense and it feels like a more natural wording. The fact in the hook appears in the article and in the cited source. QPQ is in order. However I feel the article could use another thorough read to fix grammar (e.g. "his researches"), spelling (e.g. "sabbotical") and WP:WEASEL wording (e.g. "cited by many researchers", "chapters to many books"). Please ping me when it's done. HaEr48 (talk) 05:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * , Thanks, I have corrected the spelling and usage errors. I must confess I did not quite get the one about WP:WEASEL wording. Contributing chapters to books is an oft-used phrase in science parlance and I have given multiple citations to support the wording many. Please let me have your thoughts. jojo@nthony (talk) 11:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The wording "contributing chapters" is not a problem, the problem is the fact that you used a bunch of instances as a citation to support using the word "many". In my opinion that is bordering on WP:SYNTH and is frowned upon in Wikipedia (that's why using "many" is listed in WP:WEASEL. Please avoid doing that. Also, I still see "researches" in the article. HaEr48 (talk) 16:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks mate, good point, your comments well noted. I have tweaked that sentence a bit to avoid many. Researches also have benn corrected. jojo@nthony (talk) 03:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the updates. Good to go now. HaEr48 (talk) 05:26, 18 March 2017 (UTC)