Template:Did you know nominations/N. S. Satya Murthy


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

N. S. Satya Murthy

 * ... that N. S. Satya Murthy led a team of scientists who contributed to the design and fabrication of Dhruva reactor? Dr Satya Murthy contributed significantly to the design of the neutron facilities of Dhruva reactor so that it could afford unique opportunities for a new class of experiments. He lead a team of scientist to design and fabricate, cold and hot sources, neutron guides and several classes of neutron spectrometers Indian National Science Academy profile
 * Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Peter Par Jiek

Created by Tachs (talk). Self-nominated at 03:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC).


 * Article created and nominated on 25 April. So falls within date range. Hook length appropriate. Note 1 and 2 are unnecessary in the article. Access date is missing for most of the references. Reviewing further soon. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 04:47, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Interim comments: The reviewer of one of my earlier articles objected to the use of the phrase, a number of articles, without reference. The same happened to the first citation as one has to wade through the site to reach the relevant page. This was the reason why I introduced Notes to assist the reader (or reviewer). Since it does not cause any harm, suggest they are left alone lest another reviewer raises objection again. jojo@nthony (talk) 09:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Need to provide source for "one of the highest Indian science awards". Reference 3 does not mention the claim made in the article. Reference 10 supports only last sentence and not former two.
 * The article on Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize states, It is the most coveted award in multidisciplinary science in India. This Times of India citation from that article mentions it as country's prestigious Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar award. As the award has been blue-linked, guess we can do away with such references which are already available in the blue-linked article. Just for cross reference, I am providing a few references here.

As to reference 10, it supports only the last sentence but the second sentence is supported by reference 2 which is given inline at the end of the first sentence. Trust this clarifies. jojo@nthony (talk) 17:57, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
 * (1) prestigious Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar award, considered to be a coveted science honour in the country
 * (2) The SSB Award is most coveted and often dubbed as the Nobel Prize of India in multidisciplinary science
 * (3) This award is considered the highest recognition in the Indian Scientific community
 * (4) Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prizes, the most coveted awards in Science & Technology in the country.
 * Can you please include all these sources in the article as well? - Vivvt ( Talk ) 06:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi mate, I have added citation to Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize. Guess it suffices. jojo@nthony (talk) 07:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the confusion but it should be added to N. S. Satya Murthy article as well. - Vivvt ( Talk ) 07:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * In my humble opinion, inline citations for each and every sentence is not called for when it is possible to assume good faith. The article on the Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize is referenced on the claim, so it should suffice. If we extrapolate the argument, we would be forced to provide inline citations for eg. whenever we mention Donald Trump, the president of the United States or Pope Francis. However, I have added the citation in the article as per your advice so that we may not waste more time on this. Thanks. jojo@nthony (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Incidentally, we need to do that. Anyways...all good now. This is good to go! - Vivvt ( Talk ) 07:39, 10 May 2017 (UTC)