Template:Did you know nominations/Oxford Bibliographies Online


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:07, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Oxford Bibliographies Online

 * ... that Oxford Bibliographies Online has been called an alternative to "crowdsourced knowledge repositories like Wikipedia"?
 * ALT: ... that Oxford Bibliographies Online has been called "an anti-Google"?

Created/expanded by Chetsford (talk). Self-nominated at 02:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC).

Article is new enough and long enough. It is well referenced. No pic to review. Hook is correctly formatted with an inline cite however it is about Wikipedia which is self-referential which I think we generally avoid. What about saying it has been called the "Anti-Google" which is more pithy, in the same source, and seems the more significant of the project's targets? No copy vios or close paraphrasing seen. Article may be promotional but it's neutral enough. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:08, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Philafrenzy. I've updated with an alternative. Chetsford (talk) 17:42, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Thanks. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)