Template:Did you know nominations/RWBY

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Ashwin147 (talk) 16:11, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

RWBY[edit]

  • Reviewed: Eugene Chelyshev
  • Comment: Hook is backed by an hour-long interview with Oum. The concern noted above is discussed from around the time of 50:30 to 53:00. There have been two previous deleted versions of this article that I think need to be considered by an admin to assess validity of nomination.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 23:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

5x expanded by The Devil's Advocate (talk), 69.14.66.237 (talk). Nominated by The Devil's Advocate (talk) at 23:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC).

  • The references Front Towards Gamer and Constantly Calibrating do not seem like reliable sources based on their About pages. SL93 (talk) 18:30, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
  • It is not the sites themselves being used as sources for the material, but the interviews they did with Monty Oum and other people from Rooster Teeth involved in the series.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 18:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
  • That is true, but the interviews are on unreliable sources. I wouldn't accept these sources as much as I wouldn't accept interviews on Blogspot blogs. I will see what others think. SL93 (talk) 19:00, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Citing an interview with the staff is no different than citing an official page. It is the words of the staff and creators that are being used as a source, not the site. We are not talking about an interview that was jotted down in a blog, but an interview you can hear or watch so there is no doubt as to the interview's provenance.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 19:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
  • I will see what others think. SL93 (talk) 19:10, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
    • Article new enough, long enough, fully referenced. QPQ done. Hook fine, verified against online source that can talk the leg off one of the transformers. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:17, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
  • FN2 is a bare url. Also, FTG references are not for interviews, but seem to be articles. I agree with SL93 that reliability is not shown for them. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
  • The PAX East ref has a YouTube video of the interview at the bottom, and the other FTG ref is basically just a little paragraph followed by the recording of the hour-long interview. Hawkeye apparently had no trouble locating the interviews.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 06:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Alright, found em. Ref has been fixed too. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:14, 1 July 2013 (UTC)