Template:Did you know nominations/Roma Agrawal


 * The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as |this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Roma Agrawal

 * ... that Roma Agrawal played with LEGO and then designed both the tip and bottom of the Shard (pictured)?
 * Reviewed: Deborah Hutton

Created by Jesswade88 (talk) and Zeromonk (talk). Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk) at 18:13, 6 October 2017 (UTC).


 * Symbol question.svg Timing OK, long enough, no copyvio or plagiarism. Unfortunately the information from the hook doesn't seem to be contained in the article-- or at least, the hook seems to suggest she played with Lego to design the Shard; but the article suggests she played with Lego as a child and then some decades later designed the Shard. Can you rework to make that clearer? Otherwise it's a great little tidbit, and the rest of the article is good to go! Owlsmcgee (talk) 22:14, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ALT1: ... that after playing with LEGO as a child, Roma Agrawal designed both the tip and bottom of the Shard (pictured)? --Usernameunique (talk) 14:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The wording of ALT1 seems fine but I'd prefer that we only link to the subject. LEGO is quite famous already and so doesn't need a link. Andrew D. (talk) 21:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Don't know why this is being held back for so long but I'll review it. Date and length fine. I agree that we should use ALT1 as the original is a little misleading in wording in it suggests she was playing with lego, putting it down then designing the Shard. QPQ done. No close para. Picture licence fine (was unsure if using a FP was allowed, but nothing in the DYK rules that says it can't). Good to go.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 07:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Symbol confirmed.svg Don't know why this is being held back for so long but I'll review it. Date and length fine. I agree that we should use ALT1 as the original is a little misleading in wording in it suggests she was playing with lego, putting it down then designing the Shard. QPQ done. No close para. Picture licence fine (was unsure if using a FP was allowed, but nothing in the DYK rules that says it can't). Good to go.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 07:56, 2 November 2017 (UTC)