Template talk:U

January 2009 request
editprotected

Hey, can I get someone to please add ? (I'm in the confusing situation of being unable to edit a template I myself wrote!) Thanks.  Matt Yeager   ♫  (Talk?)  03:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Interwikis
Please add these interwikis: de:Vorlage:Benutzer es:Plantilla:U ru:Template:U

I have only got these ones. Regards, Muro de Aguas (write me) 16:10, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I have created the template documentation, so you could add them to there if you like. Regards, Martinmsgj 16:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. Muro de Aguas (write me) 17:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Category:Username internal link templates
Proposal: add Category:Username internal link templates. TJRC (talk) 17:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, but you can make this edit yourself at the bottom of Template:U/doc. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:46, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks; done. I'd assumed from this and this that the catgorization had to be in the template, not in its doc file. I missed your edit here.TJRC (talk) 18:59, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Benwing, 11 May 2011: merge template U with Ul
and are almost exactly equivalent, except that  lets you specify an optional second parameter that is used as the anchor text in place of the actual username. I suggest we make work like  and then redirect  to.

looks currently like this: User:

It should look like:

User:

Benwing (talk) 03:39, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * ul is the older template. Maybe it would be better to move that template over this one? Or even better, move it to Template:User link (clearer name) and then redirect this one there as well. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * As there was no response, I have now done this. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 27 March 2014
Please add redirect categories:

Anon 126  (talk - contribs) 07:16, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting question.svg Question: Why is there a lot of parserfunction markup above, e.g. all those  - is it necessary? -- Red rose64 (talk) 12:35, 27 March 2014 (UTC)


 * @Redrose64: I was seeking to add the visible code, namely the given usage of Template:Redr, not the actual markup Face-tongue.svg (By the way, that is a result of the substitution of Template:Tlx.) This applies similarly at Template talk:Ul.  Anon 126   (talk - contribs) 02:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done With the full name of the template and fully protected. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * But isn't supposed to be substd. Just take the template syntax that you want to show, and insert   before the template name, like this:  -- Red rose64 (talk) 08:18, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I usually substitute any templates in discussion messages, but after going over WP:SUBST again...
 * "Technically, templates shall not be substituted that (a) contain calls to ParserFunctions (#if, #switch, etc.), unless, where possible, these are substituted too (see mw:Manual:Substitution#Multilevel substitution)"

- WP:SUBST


 * ... I realize that I should drop that habit. Face-blush.svg   Anon 126   (talk - contribs) 22:03, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 18 March 2017
This is a redirect is deprecated and should be replaced with Redirect category shell. Please convert to:

It does not need "fully protected" parameter because the template checks for it - like the old one did (see the current template, it lists "Fully protected" twice). Christian75 (talk) 11:11, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- John of Reading (talk) 12:22, 18 March 2017 (UTC)