User:Hahnchen/Archive7

Category Editing
Please do not edit the Xbox 360-only category in order to keep games that are also on PC off of it. The original definition is appropriate because exclusivity is compared between consoles. It is not compared across platforms. This is used as a useful category for quickly browsing the exclusive games of the various consoles. You are limiting it's functionality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bean23 (talk • contribs)
 * I'm not limiting its functionality, I am restoring it to its intended functionality, one that you are bastardising. - hahnch e n 21:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Quick note: Bean23 has mentioned that he was offended by your behavior. Personally, I don't see anything other than a revert war between you two that would warrant any sort of behavior report, but just in case things escalate, I'm willing to help out - I'm assisting with Wikiquette Alerts, so feel free to let me know if you'd like my help. &mdash; KieferSkunk (talk) &mdash; 05:52, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

2RR
OK, I've removed the warning (you can re-add it struck out if you wish). Thanks for mentioning that to me. Next time though, it would probably be more helpful if you mentioned the WT:VG discussion in your edit summary instead of just undoing. Anyway, happy editing! Giggy UCP 22:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

User:Maniac20
Yeah, I might report him for 3RR (though at this point, it's like 15RR). Just curious - will my breaking the 3RR myself result in my banning, if I report it, hmm? Fin©™ 21:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * No, because it's not your behaviour that is fucking ridiculous. The admins aren't idiots, especially if you make a note of this in the report. Don't continue reverting and just report it. - hahnch e n 21:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Good so, I'll report it! Fin©™ 21:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Here's the link to the report, in case you want to keep an eye on it - . Fin©™ 21:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Community_sanction_noticeboard
Could you elaborate on the comment you made at the noticeboard? — M o e   ε  01:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The vandal edit on your user page was made at 15:42 UTC, Spyke is never active at that time. Take a look at his contribs - Special:Contributions/TJ Spyke. - hahnch e n 01:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hows that prove it wasn't him? In fact, I think that makes it a stronger case. Unless there was another vandal from Rochester, New York, who was interested in wrestling, who happened to not like me and vandalize my userpage, I don't see how it was not him, or someone closly associated with him. — M o e   ε  01:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Take a look at all of TJ's contributions, Special:Contributions/65.37.60.195, Special:Contributions/Lrrr IV, Special:Contributions/Edgecution. He is never active at that time, I really doubt he's going to (get up early?) just to vandalise a user page.  Given the steady contributions of his IP address, I would have thought that he has a static IP. - hahnch e n 01:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, User:DS9 Voyager has been previously confirmed an IP related sockpuppet. - hahnch e n 01:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That means nothing. Inconsistancy with sockpuppets he used months ago, two of which are indefblocked doesn't prove anything. Even his IP could have changed. My IP stays in two consistant ranges, but one starts with 216 and the other starts with 202, so IP hopping isn't rare either. Early? By my watch, and since I am in the same time zone Tj is in, that edit would have been at 11:42 P.M., how is that getting up early? — M o e   ε  01:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I just don't think it's him, I have no idea why he would target User:Jéské Couriano's page, and I really don't think he'd change editing times just to vandlise a page. The vandalistic edit came on the 13th, before you were even involved in this specific case?  Given that Lrrr and Spyke have logged in after that edit, I would have guessed that the checkuser finding would be more than just "likely" which just means that it's the same ISP and area. - hahnch e n 02:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Honestly I'm optimistic, but how many editors are from Rochester, make wrestling references, and know me well enough to vandalize my Wikipedia userpage with a reference to discussion in which they were involved in previously? The vandalism (inserting the text "accomplice in the Benoit murder") is from an incident about Chris Benoit if you didn't know, and me and TJ bickered at Talk:Chris Benoit over changes. Honestly, what does it take to prove that someone can find a computer within 3 hours of their normal editing time? And if you checked the inital report on Lrrr IV, the original CheckUser came back as unrelated, but recently came back as sockpuppet.. — M o e   ε  02:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Retro Gamer
Yes, that would be completely awesome, thank-you. Email addy is duncan_timiney-at-hotmail-dot-com

Do you have access to your PC Zones yet? (I'm thinking about the Planetarion review you mentioned).

Thanks again, MarašmusïneTalk 16:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I got hold of that specific PC Zone review last week. I'll probably put up some quotes this week. - hahnch e n 16:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Age of Mythology
Thanks a lot for your comments and help with the article! I've tried to make the changes you suggested, if you could take another look at it, it would be appreciated. Happy editing, Giggy  UCP 23:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

User:3bulletproof16
Let me know if I can do anything to help you get some answers. I like the guy, but if he knows anything we should do our best to find out. Cheers, The Hyb rid  20:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't actually know anything about this guy's editing patterns or behaviour, from the RFCU it just seemed a bit suspicious. I was just wondering if others at PW knew anything about this.  The only reason I came across this is because I had Spyke's RFCU page watched after having previously suspected Lrrr. - hahnch e n 21:02, 23 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't think that anyone else could have known. TJ was very controversial to say the least. Either you loved him, or you hated him, and which one would often change. One minute he was a great ally, and the next he was a vicious opponent in a dispute. The only person to consistently like him was Bulletproof. Of course, as I've mentioned before, I'm willing to assume that Bullet didn't know. Cheers, The Hyb rid  21:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Clive Barker’s Jericho
Why have you removed the typographically correct apostrophe from the title? The official title of that game clearly uses ’ instread of vertical  '  – see Image:CBjericho front-1-.jpg. –KAMiKAZOW 09:04, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Firstly, it wasn't an apostrophe, it was a single close quotation mark. Secondly, you cannot possibly tell which apostrophe the box art uses, as we don't have access to the font.  Thirdly, every piece of official news or press release uses the standard apostrophe. - hahnch e n 11:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Hi, Hahnchen, and thanks for your participation in my RfA. I've withdrawn it, and will be writing up an "analysis" of it, which will soon be available at User:Giggy/RfA/Giggy when it's done. Please come around when you get the chance, and give me feedback on how I can improve. Thanks again, Giggy  UCP 04:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't have withdrawn, and let it ride out. Killing your own RFA is kind of a cop-out in my books, but if I see you up for RFA anytime soon, I'll support. - hahnch e n 17:22, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Image Rationales
Thanks, In future don't forget to remove the speedy tags on instances, and any warnings I put on the uploaders page :) Sfan00 IMG 13:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Elonka 2
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project, and I'll try again in a few months! If you ever have any questions or suggestions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best wishes, --Elonka 03:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Picross DS Image
Sorry, my bad. In hindsight, I should have checked the talk page and edit history first. Now I see that it was a different cover from a different country's release. Ugh... I see there's a stupid edit war over the image now... I'm so sorry, it was not my intentions to get in the middle of anything. I just assumed it was a pre-release art, since it was different from the one I have. LN3000 00:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * That's fine. - hahnch e n 00:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

University outing
Why is a university outing totally trivial? Just wondering. I'm guessing it would need coverage from external sources to be a notable event in the history, but then there is the other argument which says that once notability has been established, you don't need to keep re-establishing it for each event in the history. The real problem here is that the history is incomplete. If there was more history, then it wouldn't look so strange. My concenr now is that the article ends with the "police raid" bit. Carcharoth 13:49, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * My concern is that the entire article is totally trivial, and only exists because people feel hell bound to bend over to Jimmy Wale's wishes. I've seen it a lot of times before, such as with the guys voting to delete Arch Coal.  A university trip is absolutely trivial, would you list the hen parties which took place at Pacha?  How about the Christmas parties at the Hakkasan? - hahnch e n 19:00, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Age of Mythology
Hey man, if you get the chance, could you take a look again at this, as I've tried to do what you asked for. Thanks, &mdash; Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Can you revisit your comments here again, please? Raul654 02:52, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time
The merge was discussed, nobody opposed, so I merged the pages. Since lists are considered cruft, I figured there was no reason to include them. If you have any problems, you should leave a message on the talk page. The last time I checked, there was no policy that said EVERYTHING had to be merged, and if you don't want to merge everything, you MUST go to an afd. The guitarists one already failed an AFD, and I merged every sourced comment from the 3 lists and made sure there was an external link to the official articles for all three. What more do you want?` -- Scorpion0422 22:27, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * You've not merged every sourced comment from the 3 lists, you've ignored the primary sources. Take a look at Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time, it talks about how Ernst & Young came up with the scoring system. Nothing has been merged, no new information was taken from these and added into the Rolling Stone article.  These lists are frequently mentioned in the press, just hit them up on Google News, and articles such as this. - hahnch e n 22:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't think the information was necessary, because the three lists are just three of the dozens of similar lists that Rolling Stone has done over the years, and they really don't warrant any significant mention. There is consensus to merge, as three users agree with me, so I'm not exactly sure why I should have to go to afd. If I didn't merge anything that you feel is insignificant, then you should add it yourself, rather than undoing it. Precedent indicates that the lists will be deleted anyway. -- Scorpion0422 00:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've took a look at the Merge discussion before I reverted for the first time, that is not consensus. There is just one other user who agrees with the merge, The JPS.  I don't think these are just run of the mill lists that you see every few months, but a special edition one off.  The 500 Greatest albums of all time can be found as a hardcover book release, and there are news articles discussing the very lists. - hahnch e n 00:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I did add the note about the accounting firm, but the rest of the articles was just analysis and random trivia. I suggest you read WP:TRIVIA. If you really insist that it go to afd, then I guess I have no choice. -- Scorpion0422 00:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * If it were to merge, I'd want more in depth critique using some of the links mentioned above, and to have the lists split off into their own section on the page, possibly under the heading "50th Anniversary of Rock". But I'd still rather send it to AFD, just to get more input, I feel that some of the lists such as the album list could stand alone.  I'll probably revert it tomorrow, it's late. - hahnch e n 00:41, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Again, why exactly are these lists notable? Rolling Stone has done hundreds of articles that have gotten a lot of response from independant sources, but we can't have a seperate page for all of them. I wouldn't object to a "50th Anniversary of Rock" section, or even a "Famous articles" section. And, edit warring is not a solution, so I suggest discussing it and reaching some kind of agreement before reverting. -- Scorpion0422 00:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ballistics Arcade.png
Hello.

"Photo provided by Ernest Yale of Triotech Amusement, under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license"

For all agreement of free license, we need an OTRS mail to trust the agreement. So I would like to know if you contact Ernest Yale of Triotech by mail ? Or if they release this free screenshot in CC-BY-SA themself. Is there any web link about this licence on this image. Thanks a lot. bayo 12:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The permission was given via email. I've emailed OTRS, and have been in contact with Judson Dunn about tagging a confirmation.  The reason this has not been done, is because the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license was not mentioned specifically.  I can forward you the permissions if needed, with the necessary contact details to confirm this. - hahnch e n 16:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, i have got an OTRS access. bayo 18:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Warhawk
I posted on the talk page of WikiProject: Video Games.--Playstationdude 22:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

I added another post. I checked out the page you said and it turns out it is for people that don't know how to do it. I will go ahead and do it, but if you do have any rejections just let me know if you don't like it.--Playstationdude 00:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Episode One FAC
Thankyou for your comments. I've made a few additions and alterations per your suggestions. Qjuad 23:27, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thankyou for your additional comments. I have made a series of additions and alterations per your further suggestions. Qjuad 22:54, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Over the Hedge
Hello,

ALTTP has informed me that you were previously discussing the article Over the Hedge (Nintendo DS). A merge discussion is currently on-going for this article. If you would like to add this this discussion, please see Talk:Over the Hedge (Nintendo DS). - RedWordSmith 04:23, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Warhawk
Hi there, I missed your reply on my talk page at User_talk:W.marsh. I wasn't ignoring you, I just didn't see the comment. At any rate, I have now reverted the moves. --W.marsh 18:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DoD Kalt Bridge.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:DoD Kalt Bridge.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Successful RfA - Thank you!
Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It was successful, and I was promoted to Administrator today. I appreciate the support! &mdash; KieferSkunk (talk) &mdash; 23:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Castlevania: Dawn of Sorrow
I've addressed your comment at the above FAC. Thanks,  Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 21:57, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

fun fact
If you put an umlaut on the a of your name, you get the German word for chicken. Or little chicken. Just thought I'd point that out for kicks. Pandacomics (talk) 21:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Complete and utter bullshit
^ Not the most appropriate reason for CSD. Just an observation.  Lara  ❤  Love  21:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * But the right one. - hahnch e n 23:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Regarding that comment
I forgot about that reason, and am ready to withdraw my nomination after finding out something this substantial has surfaced. I forgot about a lack of paper sources, and wouldn't feel comfortable with this being promoted until there are more paper sources for a game this old. I personally don't have any sources that old, but I am looking into it on the magazine project. As a compromise between cyber and paper resources, some magazines publish old reviews in archives, and it is these sources for which I am searching for. However, I don't know what magazines (other than EGM and Edge, which I checked) existed back then. Do you know of any old magazines that I may be able to look into for old archived reviews?--CM (talk) 23:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * If you message User:X201, he'll give you a copy of the Edge review. It will probably be quite short though as with all Edge reviews in that period.  I'm pretty sure that this is the C&VG review that appeared in print.  I believe the date stamp to be inaccurate to when it was written, but is just a generic batch upload date stamp.  I can't be certain of either of these two points though.  User:Mitaphane has a copy of the Next Generation Magazine review, but he has not edited for months now. Also on WP:CVG/M, you'll find that User:Ashnard has access to a retrospective article from Official Nintendo Magazine, this might be helpful. - hahnch e n 13:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah I missed the Edge one; all others have been contacted. By the way, if I were to reference the C&VG review, would I simply use the posting date of it onto the website, or should I attempt to assume when it was released in print? I think the former wold be preferable, but its kind of an interesting situation.--CM (talk) 22:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Using the date it was published online would be fine. - hahnch e n 13:39, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I think the article is ready now. If this FAC fails, it will probably be a while before I return to this project. I don't think Mitaphane is returning any time soon, and I've already integrated Edge, CVG, and Nintendo Magazine, which help to balance out the article. Someone also stepped forward and added the manual, so I really have nothing left to do. I know you are busy, but if you could read through 1080° Snowboarding for any long-term, glaring, or undetected problems before its FAC, I would greatly appreciate it. Either way, thank you for your invaluable help and advice.--CM (talk) 15:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * P.S. Nice Esperanza "e"

Featured article candidates/Final Fantasy Tactics
I've addressed your opposition. &mdash; Blue. 21:16, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Just an update, it seems he has further addressed other points of yours. Axem Titanium (talk) 19:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I've already read it. It does not satisfy my concerns.  The whole reception section is based on web sources with little readership or influence at the time of release.  Adding a few quotes from established sources does help, but the whole section is generally based on IGN, GameSpot and RPGFan.  This stance on sourcing is not a new position on my behalf, I have commented on this issue before. - hahnch e n 18:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi
Why did you revert the Lost in Blue cover art to the lower quality European version? Just wondering.. Aileza (talk) 06:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The rule of thumb is to stick with the original version, it's normally to stop arguments arising from shouts of cultural imperialism such as those seen at Talk:Wii Play, Talk:Mario Strikers Charged etc. - hahnch e n 22:18, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

 * -- AKeen (talk) 15:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

SE Asia
Perhaps I should add the undeveloped parts of south east asia to the main page of the systematic bias project as requiring attention -perhaps it would create more interest. Even if it was two or three it would make a big difference ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦      Talk? 16:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Twiggy_promo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Twiggy_promo.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * This has been addressed at Image talk:Twiggy promo.jpg and Deletion review/Log/2007 February 7. - hahnch e n 13:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tenchu.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tenchu.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * This has been addressed. - hahnch e n 19:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)