User:Pia L/sandbox3

 Shortcuts ([ edit] &middot; changes )  Things you can do ([ edit] )
 * Project resources
 * Image database
 * Image copyright primer
 * Source material in the public domain
 * Project templates
 * Categories/Portal
 * Terms and translations
 * Offical translations of terms
 * Wikipedia naming conventions
 * References
 * Government links
 * Links to laws and regulations
 * Literature lists by category
 * Assessment
 * Awards
 * Peer review
 * Outreach
 * Visitors: Ask a Swede
 * Editors by specialty and interest
 * Adopt an article

 Sweden article statistics (view full worklist ) This list is generated automatically every night around 10 PM EST.
 * Search and assess articles

MENU STOLEN FROM PROJECT CREATED BY User:Plange: SeeWikiProject_Firefly

Test menu short cut Sweden project
The Sweden Wikiproject is a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Sweden.

Scope
There are, in all, probably around 10,000 articles on English Wikipedia related to Sweden. The initial plan is to improve a selected number of well-known core articles. Core articles are things that most people recognize as related to Sweden.

Goals
Bringing all core articles first to Good status. When this has been done, bringing them to Feature status.

Article reviews
When an article has been sufficiently improved, read about What Good Articles are, and the quality standard of them. When you think the article meats the criteras, add to the nominated article's talk page. Then list the article here, for us to review.


 * Nominated articles:
 * Carolus Linnaeus (Carl von Linné) went through a review and several things needed correction. A prt of the article is of good quality. / Fred-Chess 08:55, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Peer reviews
This is not a peer review in the academic sense, but is instead a review by project members; such peer reviews are invaluable in obtaining constructive commentary on an article, and are particularly helpful for articles which are headed towards featured article candidacies. Project peer reviews are more helpful than Wikipedia-wide ones, both because there is a greater chance of encountering a reviewer with some knowledge of the topic, and because it is much easier for project members to notice new requests without the need to filter out the vast majority of ones not related to their area of interest.


 * For hints, see:
 * Article development
 * The perfect article


 * Nominated articles:
 * add your article

Core articles

 * : The article is listed as a Good article
 * : The article is listed as a Featured article.

Members

 * Fred-Chess
 * Skizzik
 * Krm500