User talk:107.179.229.114

June 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to History of Kyiv, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 19:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Authoritarian capitalism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, I'm Arado Ar 196. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Odysseus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Arado Ar 196 (C✙T) 14:12, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ancient Greek astronomy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 14:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)


 * the content that i removed was racist, and it was explained as much in the edit. the idea that homer had a small contribution could only be presented by an islamic fundamentalist and should be removed from the site. but, it's clear that wikipedia has been bought out by arab money, and has been reduced to a propaganda outlet by islamic extremists. that language must be removed from the page, and you should be embarrassed for blocking me from correcting it, rather than addressing it. 107.179.229.114 (talk) 16:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * the proper way to deal with wikipedia moving forwards is to boycott it until it severely reforms how it deals with content. 107.179.229.114 (talk) 16:07, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * i don't have any interest in creating an account on wikipedia and will let the site's abhorrent conduct stand on it's own. as stated repeatedly, teh site should be embarrassed for reversing edits i've made, that have deleted absurdly racist content written from a ridiculous pro-arab bias. if wikipedia wants to be a propaganda arm for the government of saudi arabia, it should be boycotted in response. 107.179.229.114 (talk) 16:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)