User talk:63.73.199.69

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page They Died with Their Boots On has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 20:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Simha (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wikiscient (talk) 21:23, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Power nap has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 12:59, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Dabangg. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -   Managerarc    talk  22:44, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2012
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at John Madden, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Bongwarrior (talk) 16:04, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mephistophelian (contact) 14:25, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, I'm John of Reading. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Portal:Indian independence movement/Selected pictures without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! John of Reading (talk) 05:53, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, KDBC-TV, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Materialscientist (talk) 23:02, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to KDBC-TV, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 05:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of S&P 600 companies concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of S&P 600 companies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of S&P 600 companies


Hello 63.73.199.69. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "List of S&P 600 companies".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Lohani, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 20:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Watch Dogs has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:17, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

August 2015
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Real Ghostbusters. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Kemmangundi seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   12:12, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 06:40, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Judith Resnik— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   03:17, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alcohol intoxication with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm Kaobear. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Death of Wolverine has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kaobear (talk) 21:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pittsburgh Pirates. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. EricEnfermero (Talk) 14:33, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016
Hello, I'm Ilyushka88. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Finding Nemo has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Ilyushka ☃  Talk!Contribs 15:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016
Hello, I'm BurritoBazooka. An edit that you recently made to Auroville seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --BurritoBazooka If you reply here, please add   to your message 08:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016
Hello, I'm RSTech1. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ambulatory care— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RSTech1 (talk) 15:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ambulatory care. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RSTech1 (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm L3X1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to TCS China have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. L3X1 (distænt write)  01:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Esan people have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 23:52, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ford Mustang (third generation), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm 73.220.136.176. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Margaret Ann Neve have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. 73.220.136.176 (talk) 16:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018
Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Game of Thrones (season 8)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus  (talk to me) 07:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Donatello (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) 00:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019
Hello, I'm AryanTheArticleArtist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Method stub— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ★ AɾყαɳTԋҽAɾƚιƈʅҽAɾƚιʂƚ ★  ✉  10:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Method stub. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ★ AɾყαɳTԋҽAɾƚιƈʅҽAɾƚιʂƚ ★  ✉  10:34, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Newport (cigarette), you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 01:16, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Pandey
Hello. Your recent edit to Pandey appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Giovani Lo Celso. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:25, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 00:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Montell Griffin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:11, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Arizona—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm Synoman Barris. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Bohemia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Megan Barris  (Lets talk📧)  21:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to History of Louisiana—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:17, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm Biglittlehugesmall65. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Robbie Fowler have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.   Biglittlehugesmall65 (talk) 15:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2022
Hi 63.73.199.69! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Actual play several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at Talk:Actual play, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Sariel Xilo (talk) 05:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

July 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Crull's Island, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. 123Writer talk 19:40, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Fast X, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. microbiology Marcus (petri dish) 19:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC)