User talk:67.239.64.253

September 2010
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Zooey Deschanel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cresix (talk) 17:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lely High School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ► Philg88 ◄ star.png 00:50, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Coevolution worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Johnuniq (talk) 07:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Michael Novak, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Michael Novak was changed by 67.239.64.253 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96564 on 2011-05-04T22:52:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:52, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Prince, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Prince was changed by 67.239.64.253 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895544 on 2011-10-13T17:19:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:19, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Ave Maria University, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 23:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 99.12.242.170 (talk) 19:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * It doesn't help that you're continuing to remove well-sourced content, with the explanation that it's all wrong. You'll need more than that to justify deleting the passages in question. 99.12.242.170 (talk) 19:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Please discuss on the article's talk page rather than edit warring!  Swarm   X 02:19, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Ave Maria University
Hello 67.239.64.253. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ave Maria University, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 22:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius was changed by 67.239.64.253 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950485 on 2011-11-04T20:11:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:11, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:67.239.64.253, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 20:40, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello 67.239.64.253. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ave Maria University, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 20:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello 67.239.64.253. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ave Maria University, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 23:47, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * It would be useful to talk about changes on the discussion page. Since you are associated with the University, it would be a confidence builder (or the reverse!) to other editors to learn in what capacity you are serving. If it is part of the administration, that really should be disclosed. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 20:19, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Ave Maria University. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 02:48, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at User talk:67.239.64.253, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 19:25, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Penguinluver1431. There's no real point in bothering, though, it's pretty clear you're the same editor. Maybe you could try taking a hint? Ian.thomson (talk) 23:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring at Occupy Wall Street
Your recent editing history at Occupy Wall Street shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- Brangifer (talk) 23:26, 11 March 2012 (UTC) alrite then, where's this talk page for OWS? It's about time I get some FACTS straightened out

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Materialscientist (talk) 23:31, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:67.239.64.253. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:48, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * -Well then how about I tell some good old-fashioned FACTS about our current issue before pushing a bias POV? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.239.64.253 (talk • contribs)
 * Considering a variety of editors from a variety of backgrounds have reverted you, you may need to reconsider where the POV accusations need to go. WP:Verifiability is the cornerstone of this site, not WP:TRUTH.  Ian.thomson (talk) 23:53, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I have not deleted any CONTENT, just MOVED it under controversy WHERE IT BELONGS. Do you see Penn State's page having a beginning summary about their recent sex scandal, or any other college? On that note, you CANNOT put something controversial in the opening summary on the page in question. That's all there is to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.239.64.253 (talk • contribs)
 * Except that:
 * the controversy that occured in Penn State was not a result of the founder, it was with a few employees in the sports department
 * the Penn state controversy was not about someone getting fired for expressing concern over the university's financial situation, it was over some seriously bad behavior
 * the Penn State Nittany Lions football does indeed discuss the scandal in the introduction,
 * we have an entire article covering the Penn State sex abuse scandal.
 * Quite a difference. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sexuality of Abraham Lincoln, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Vrenator    talk   14:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Ave Maria University Hates The Republican Party?
Please stop.--Milowent • hasspoken 17:31, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Gwen Chan 15:26, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Hello, 67.239.64.253. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ave Maria University, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 21:53, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012
Hello, I'm Sunray. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ratchet because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sunray (talk) 06:44, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

February 2013
Hello, I'm Torreslfchero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to this edit to Ligament (bivalve), because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Torreslfchero (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ligament (bivalve) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Suave  13:49, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Smalljim. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to this edit to Sons of Liberty, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, —S MALL  JIM   18:01, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Siege of Yorktown, you may be blocked from editing. Shearonink (talk) 20:10, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Siege of Yorktown. Widr (talk) 20:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John of the Cross, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. TwoTwoHello (talk) 13:27, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013
Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Maurice Prendergast, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Yintan ²   13:26, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Winfield Scott because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 19:50, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shortstop. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Accurizer (talk) 03:25, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Odysseus without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!  Neil N  talk to me  03:42, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014
Hello, I'm Petrb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Francisco Franco, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Petrb (talk) 21:26, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Victor Bodson because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 13:14, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Ave Maria University, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 20:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Invitation to join new discussions on Ave Maria University talk page
Hi! In light of a flurry of recent edits to Ave Maria University, I've opened a couple of new discussions at Talk:Ave Maria University. We should probably work to achieve consensus there. I'll be inviting all the named users who have been editing at AMU. Thanks in advance for your input! Jacona (talk) 14:30, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Pier Giorgio Frassati— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Maximilian Kolbe with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 18:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Ecclesiastes
Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Ecclesiastes article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 00:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm The Voidwalker. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sacraments of the Catholic Church— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- The Voidwalker  Whispers 21:14, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, I'm 1989. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chivalry have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. MCMLXXXIX 18:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017
Hello, I'm DrStrauss. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Guernsey— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dr Strauss  talk  18:24, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Guernsey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dr Strauss  talk  18:24, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Guernsey, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, I'm Simplexity22. An edit that you recently made to Hugo Chávez seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Simplexity22 (talk) 02:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Donatello, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. LynxTufts (talk) 20:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018
Hello, I'm Yexstorm2001. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to English words without vowels have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 🎼 Yexstorm2001 🎼 (talk) 21:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:10, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Ave Maria University
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ave Maria University, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://archive.naplesnews.com/news/guest-essay-jim-towey--mother-teresa-is-coming-to-ave-maria-university-ep-313140685-341485331.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 * Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Ave Maria University and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Ave Maria University, in their email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ave Maria University. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Ave Maria University with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

See Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Ave Maria University saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Genericusername57 (talk) 19:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Hello, I'm Everedux. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Eichhornia crassipes have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Everedux (talk) 01:56, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Angela Ponce. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 23:49, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm OcarinaOfTime. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ave Maria University, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. OcarinaOfTime (talk) 20:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm DB1729. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Disco ball have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DB1729 (talk) 23:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2023
Your recent editing history at Ascension of Jesus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. tgeorgescu (talk) 01:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Ascension of Jesus that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 04:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Factory worker—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello, I'm Shadow311. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Capetillo family, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shadow311 (talk) 19:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)