User talk:86.160.228.56

April 2024
Hello, I'm Plantsurfer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Talk:Deep time have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Plant surfer 19:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm JeffSpaceman. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Horlick, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 14:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Horlick, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JeffSpaceman (talk) 14:07, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Horlick, you may be blocked from editing. JeffSpaceman (talk) 14:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JeffSpaceman (talk) 14:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Horlick. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please have a look at WP:NOTDICTIONARY and WP:DICT; Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Thank you!'' Felida97 (talk) 15:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Note that I have now added a link to the wiktionary entry at the top of the page. Felida97 (talk) 15:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Felida97 (talk) 14:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I had hoped you would just drop this, but insulting another editor is not acceptable. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 17:03, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.