User talk:AGiorgio08

=2009=

WP:MADGE
I'm quite impressed by your steadfast handling of the single cover situation of the "Celebration" song.Would you be interested in joining the Madonna Wikiproject. --Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 10:11, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No probs. Welcome to the project. Your opinions are extremely valued. By the way, I'm pushing the bio of Madonna for FA. Your contributions and comments are expected :) --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 13:18, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Just so you know
Just so you know (for in the future), when you award barnstars you give them on the user's talk page and they choose whether to move it to their userpage. (I saw your award to User:Yworo). Thanks, and happy editing! :)  Malinaccier ( talk ) 03:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar
That's very kind of you. Thanks! Yworo (talk) 03:46, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Re:File:Madonna Confessions Remixed.jpg
Hi AGiorgio08. I have deleted File:Madonna Confessions Remixed.jpg under WP:CSD (author request deletion) Best,  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 04:18, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Confessions Remixed
Hi there, just a little note to let you know not to include any bootleg information or images on Wiki, its not relevant nor appropriate to the pages such as Confessions_on_a_Dance_Floor. We need to keep it factual and not include this information as it is not official nor necessary. Thanks  J W A D  talk 21:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No worries at all, we just need to keep this irrelevant information off the pages altogether as it has nothing to do with the releases. Anyone can make up a bootleg, so this is why it should never be mentioned nor included. :)  J W A D  talk 21:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Snow Leopard Userbox
Thanks for your note. As you saw copyrighted images cannot be put in userboxes. This is not just a Wikipedia rule, but US copyright law (the Wikipedia servers are in Florida so come under US laws). Copyrighted images can only be used as per "fair use" provisions, like fair comment, etc. This allows copyrighted images to be used in articles, but clearly does not include "fan uses" like userboxes. As far as making up your own image and uploading it to Commons and using that, that is fine, as long as it is not a substantial copy of the copyrighted logo. the "X" image I substituted in your userbox was just that - click on it to see how it was uploaded and under what licence. I hope that answers your questions? - -Ahunt (talk) 17:53, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

User:SpermGobbler
This account is not a sockpuppet of User:Bongwarrior. Bongwarrior blocked the SpermGobbler account as it is offensive and against the user name policy. I believe that Bongwarrior changed all of the welcome templates left by SpermGobbler as a courtesy to the new editors so they would not be welcomed by an offensive user name. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:33, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

98.67.162.34 Edits
Time for suspension? Matt Gies (talk) 21:49, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Britney Template
So what? Are u gonna include all the songs that are listed on notable songs section on the main template???? I dont think so, i mean, not just me, people wont think that, cuz if u add them, they will remove them again, cuz they created that notable section to include those songs.Fortunato luigi (talk) 06:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from I've Just Begun (Having My Fun)
Hello PopMusicWillNeverBeLowBrow, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to I've Just Begun (Having My Fun) has been removed. It was removed by Closedmouth with the following edit summary ' (prod is contested, please take it to afd instead if you wish to have it deleted (per WP:PROD)) '. Please consider discussing your concerns with Closedmouth before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 01:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Falling Down EP.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Falling Down EP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —  Σ  xplicit 05:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Removed prod tag from Ubuntu-title.png
I have removed the prod tag from File:Ubuntu-title.png, which you proposed for deletion, because the page you proposed for deletion was not an article. If you still think the page should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to it, as proposed deletion is only for articles. Instead, consider using WP:FFD for this page. In some cases, a speedy deletion criterion may apply. Thanks! --  At am a  頭 05:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
kelapstick (talk) 22:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Early photgraph of CambridgeBayWeather.jpg
Regarding to File:Early photgraph of CambridgeBayWeather.jpg, that speedy deletion rational does not apply to images, and I am not sure why you nominated it.--kelapstick (talk) 22:51, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, I'm a little confused over this. Contrary to the rationale "because it is not an image, sound or video file", it is in fact file an image file. While it is not actually being used in an article it is being used on both my user page and at Facebook, where there are a lot of similar images. Were you intending to tag a different file? Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 22:53, 28 August 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem. I figured it was just something simple like that. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 22:55, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Be with You (Wilber Pan & Akon song)
Hi again, I saw that you also nominated a bunch of redirects to Be with You (Wilber Pan & Akon song) for speedy deletion, I am not going to weigh in on the merits of the song having an article not, but the speedy deletion criteria you used is only for articles that either don't exist or are tagged for speedy deletion (not Proposed for deletion). Again, not a big deal, but you should have waited for the song article to be deleted, than nominated the redirects. Cheers.--kelapstick (talk) 23:01, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sounds reasonable, just thought I would make sure that you knew. Have a great weekend.--kelapstick (talk) 23:09, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

WP:3RR
Your last problem wasn't acted on because everyone had stopped reverting by the time admins got to the report, but I wanted to make sure that you understand that you did violate 3RR, and Pcdfan678 did not. It doesn't matter whether the reversions are related, whether you hit the "undo" button, the "rollback" button, or manually edit: if you take the article to an earlier state more than three times ("more than three" meaning "four or more") in a 24-hour period, you've violated 3RR, with exceptions only for vandalism reversion, BLP related reversions, and copyright/image use issues. You appear to be a good faith editor, and I would hate to see you blocked because you misunderstand the rule. You lucked out this time, but I wouldn't count on that happening twice.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

PROD removed from CH30
I have removed the dated PROD tag from CH30 because the proposed deletion process applies only to articles, not to redirects. Redirects may be discussed at WP:Redirects for discussion. Cnilep (talk) 17:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I have removed PROD from DXGM (video codec) for the same reason. Cnilep (talk) 19:00, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Adoption
Hi! My name is Evangeline. I am offering you a chance to be adopted by me. As an ex-adoptee, my adoption program is structured to help you learn the basics of wiki-editing and how to avoid the pit-falls that are common for editors. If you would like to accept my offer, please leave a message on my talk page. Bejinhan Talk   14:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, done. :) Here is your program page. Please put it in your watchlist and complete the first task by introducing yourself. Thank you! Bejinhan  Talk   06:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Can you please introduce yourself here? Btw, I was looking through your contributions and noticed that you seem to be quite familiar with wikipedia. When did you join Wikipedia? Bejinhan  Talk   02:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * That's good. Finish introducing yourself and I'll set you on your next task. Bejinhan  Talk   13:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

PROD removed from YouTube Awards
I have removed the prod tag from YouTube Awards, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! There are over a dozen refs from reliable, mainstream media sources, which shows notability. UncleDouggie (talk) 06:57, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Task
-clears throat- Ahem! Can you please introduce yourself here so that I can give you your next task? There's some things I need to know before proceeding. Thank you. Bejinhan Talk   05:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! That's ok. I understand. Have you written any articles before? Bejinhan  Talk   03:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

PRODs removed from Vitas album articles
Greetings.

I have removed the prod tag from Philosophy of Miracle, which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks!

I have removed the prod tag from The Songs of My Mother, which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks!

I have removed the prod tag from Smile! (Vitas album), which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks!

I have removed the prod tag from Mama (Vitas album), which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks!

I have removed the prod tag from A Kiss as Long as Eternity, which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks!

I also re-linked the album titles in the Discography section of the main Vitas article (even the albums which don't yet have their own article).

I know that at present the album articles are fairly short, but as I explained on the talk pages, I don't think including tracklistings in the Discography section of the main article would be the right approach, nor would deleting the information altogether. There is also other valuable information (e.g. songwriters on the album Mama) which might not conveniently fit into a list within another article; furthermore there is potential for further development of these articles. As it happens, writing new Vitas album articles and improving existing ones was already on my to-do list (yes, literally).

Please don't underestimate the importance of such articles on Wikipedia. In some cases it may be the only online source available for certain data (as I believe is the case regarding the songwriting credits on Mama, at least in English} and in many (perhaps nearly all) cases it is the only source which will freely give the reader the knowledge they seek without trying to sell anything to them. Wikipedia is a precious and unique resource.

If you think the Discography section in Vitas' article requires citations I will add some, though I don't think this is generally expected in discographies except in the case of new articles and/ or obscure releases. The discography on Vitas' website is already cited as a reference for the single Opera #2 (which was a special case because iTunes had mislabelled it as Opera #1, so a citation was requested for clarification). Vitas' website can provide references for all of the CDs and most of the DVDs and music videos, though in general finding reliable English language sources for information on Vitas can be problematic. I notice on your Userpage that you speak several languages including Russian, so if you'd like to contribute positively to the article, some research to provide additional references would be very welcome. I plan to make a few improvements to the main Vitas article over the weekend.

If I may offer some general advice, you could ease up a bit with the deletion proposals: Wikipedia isn't about to run out of space, honest! One of Wikipedia's great strengths is the breadth of subject matter covered. The way I see it, there are 3 main questions to ascertain an article's suitability for Wikipedia:


 * Is it factually accurate, or at least verifiable?
 * Does it comply with Wikipedia policies, or can it be edited so that it does?
 * Is there a significant chance that readers, even if only a handful, will come to Wikipedia in search of the information contained in the article?

Articles fulfilling those criteria should be welcomed.

Crumbs, I didn't mean to write an essay! Nice username btw. All the best,

Contains Mild Peril (talk) 13:58, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Pardon my asking, but did you even read a single word I said? Contains Mild Peril (talk) 15:03, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your honest reply. Contains Mild Peril (talk) 01:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Just a note to let you know I noticed and appreciate your efforts to help improve these articles (including tidying up after my somewhat hurried edits). Collectively, minor edits can be just as important as major ones. Contains Mild Peril (talk) 02:23, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Re:Talk:This Is Us (Backstreet Boys album)
Sorry, what do you mean by dead link? I clicked on the link and it worked perfectly fine. Or did you mean to replace that link with another reference in the article? If so, which reference (what number)? PopMusicBuff talk 20:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Better later than never. The link in second reference doesn't work. Here:

Elenathe1 (talk) 17:50, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

ANI Notification
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. See Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. Exxolon (talk) 00:15, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes - Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents - another editor was complaining about your tagging on an article. It's been resolved as not requiring admin intervention, however they should've informed you when they made the complaint. Exxolon (talk) 01:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

That was not good tagging. Many of those issues didn't even apply to the article. Uncle G (talk) 01:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Centijimbos
Hello AGiorgio08, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Centijimbos - a page you tagged - because: Not nonsense - there is meaningful content. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. — Jake   Wartenberg  15:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

New article
Hi. Ready for your next task? Well, I would like you to create a new article on any topic of your choice and raise it up to B-class. I'll give you any guidance you need. Please get back to me. Thanks! Bejinhan Talk   07:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Album Covers
Hundreads of other albums have different covers listed, why is The Singles Collection any different? ---Shadow (talk) 18:37, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LoveGame Remix EP.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:LoveGame Remix EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:51, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

=2010=

Jeffree Star photo
A professional, high quality photo as the main image of a biography article is more favourable than a screenshot. To keep this fair however, I have kept your image but moved elsewhere in the article. I hope you understand. Thank you. Jonny (talk) 18:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexander George (entertainer)
A tag has been placed on Alexander George (entertainer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 05:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Icon 7 webplayer.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Icon 7 webplayer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 12:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
~ N ERDY S CIENCE D UDE  (✉ message • changes) 00:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hoobastank the reason.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Hoobastank the reason.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:46, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

The Dreamers (film) ‎ (Added info regarding sequel)
Hi AGiorgio08. Please could you explain (maybe on The Dreamers talk page) how Le mariage à trois is related to The Dreamers? I can't see the connection, so maybe other users won't see it either. Thanks, Northernhenge (talk) 21:01, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi again. I've undone the change for now. Do you have any evdence of a connection? I can't find any unfortunately. --Northernhenge (talk) 16:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Confirmation de changer mon nom
Ce message est pour la vérification de ma demande pour changer mon nom de compte sur le site Wikipédia en français, de "PopMusicWillNeverBeLowBrow" à "PopMusicBuff". Merci d'avance.

Aussi, je crois qu'on aura du de supprimer mon compte courant en français que j'ai cree accidentellement, pour faire ce mouvement. Êtes-vous capable de faire cela pour moi, ou est-il un endroit où je besoin d'aller à le faire? Merci encore.

 A Giorgio 08  talk  15:37, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅. I am not a number (I am a free man) 16:56, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Response to discussion of User:NickapediRL/Richard Rhodes
Hello  A Giorgio 08 . I am replying to your comments on the discussion page of User:NickapediRL/Richard Rhodes.

1. I have created a hatnote for the page referring to Richard Rhodes the writer. How do I change my article title to Richard Rhodes (Sculptor) and move it into the main space of Wikipedia?

2. I am not Richard Rhodes. I am a student of stonework and a mason in training. I discovered Rhodes' work at the Tacoma Art Museum after moving to Seattle. Please see the several citations from major international publications following my article for references to the merits of Rhodes' work. Thanks for your help. NickapediRL (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your note  A Giorgio 08  I will keep practicing! NickapediRL (talk) 18:38, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Request for global deletion
This is to confirm to the active steward attending my request, that I wish to have my former account, PopMusicWillNeverBeLowBrow, eradicated, as I use this account only and have only been using the other account lately to change all my global account names there. Thank you.  A Giorgio 08  talk  17:55, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

PopMusicBuff on it.wiki
Hi, as a general rule local accounts cannot be deleted, they can just be renamed to something else. Anyway, in the case of PopMusicBuff, we can hardly do anything, as it is already a SUL account, so the name PopMusicBuff is automatically reserved for you on any Wikimedia project in any language. You didn't accidentally create the Italian account, you are PopMusicBuff everywhere on Wikimedia projects because of SUL. For more information, please refer to meta:Help:Unified login. Ciao, Ary29 (talk) 11:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Google Dashboard
An article that you have been involved in editing, Google Dashboard, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 01:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

A recent WP:TFD relisting
Howdy. May I ask why you didn't close this discussion and decided to relist it again? It has been almost a month since it was first listed. To me, this seems long enough to decide if it should be closed with keep, delete, or no consensus. WP:RELIST even says "...if consensus has not formed in three weeks of debate, there is by definition no consensus and the discussion should be closed accordingly." If you decide the discussion should still stay open, could you please add a reasoning for this to the TfD discussion?--Rockfang (talk) 01:37, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I just realized one possible reason you didn't close it: you aren't an admin. I would like to suggest that you refrain from relisting TfDs like this one in the future.  I could understand if there were only one or two comments in the discussion, but this one had 16 votes/comments/suggestions on it.--Rockfang (talk) 04:58, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Mobile device unblock request
✅  A Giorgio 08  talk  16:36, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but you'll need to contact J. Delanoy (by going to his page and clicking on "email this user" on the left) or the arbitration committee at arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org in order to request an unblock - checkuser blocks cannot be undone by anyone but checkusers or arbcom. TN X Man  17:43, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * If the problem continues, you can try requesting IP block exemption —  Tivedshambo   (t/c) 17:49, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Translated tag
Template:Translated tag has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Kwj2772 (talk) 15:47, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

=2011=

Kingston student ghetto tags
I just wanted you to know i agree with your tagging efforts on the page. Frankly it could stand to be reduced. I just think given the pages history that a discussion on the page is warrented rather than a prod. If you wanted to propose a merge and re-direct i certaintly would support that (I think truly theres only about 3 things in there of significance currently) And a merge would allow someone to expand it later when they could do it properly. Whatever you decide. cheers Ottawa4ever (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Autotranslate


A tag has been placed on Template:Autotranslate, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Evil IP address (talk) 16:46, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

What's wrong with adding a Bibliography to Taboo's article?
✅ I'm puzzled about your removal of my addition of a Bibliography section to Taboo's page, which you claimed was "per WP:N." I read the WP:N page (again--of course I'm aware of the issue of Notability) and it has a section titled "Notability guidelines do not limit content within an article" in which it states "The notability guidelines do not apply to article or list content." So if the WP:N guidelines do not apply to article content, how can that be your basis for removing a reference to an autobiography co-written by the subject of the article? The book is new, but I gave valid citation information about the book (publisher, ISBN, etc.). I plan on undoing your revision unless you can convince me that my edit isn't in keeping with WP guidelines. --DTinAZ (talk) 16:53, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for putting it back. --DTinAZ (talk) 18:44, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Daft Punk
Regarding your recent edit to the article, would you please explain why you undid my edit? Another editor blanked nearly an entire section, without explanation, and my edit restored the blanked content. jhsounds (talk) 01:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I was the same user, and it is per WP:WPMAG and WP:WORKS.  A Giorgio 08  talk  04:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Windows 8
Hi, I removed your sentences in History of Microsoft Windows about cloud-based technologies in Windows 8, because they are not sourced. I found some sites speculating some of the stuff that you wrote, but nothing definitively saying this stuff. So I'm redoing my edit. Also, I couldn't find a reliable source saying Windows 8 would include IE10. - Josh (talk | contribs) 22:22, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Lady Gaga
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Lady Gaga. Thank you. Bilby (talk) 01:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * My apologies - I shouldn't have used a template, because you probably had good cause for adding the content. I'm too used to responding to vandalism on the page. However, I think you'll need a good source for that claim, and it might be better included in the body rather than a lead. I suspect you may also need to check on the discussion page - it is a strong claim, so there may be opposition. - Bilby (talk)

Orphaned non-free image File:Adobe CS Product Logos.png
✅  Thanks for uploading File:Adobe CS Product Logos.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

RM
What was the point of this edit? --Damiens .rf 14:49, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you be a little more specific? AGiorgio08 (talk) 17:33, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * More specific than that? Why did you remove comments on a talk page discussion? --Damiens .rf 17:39, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

AGiorgio08 your edits have been reverted by User:Damiens.rf because you are removing other editors comments. I appreciate that you are trying to remove your own comment but note it is more common to strike out your comment rather than delete otherwise other editors comments may not make sense. So please if you want to withdrawn your comments then surround them with ...text..., see WP:REDACT. Thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 17:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Olympics 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2012 Summer Olympics. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Your request to have a well sourced article on one of the world's biggest sporting events deleted coupled with the inappropriate reason can only be construed as vandalism and not a serious request. Ba se me nt 12  (T.C) 16:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2012 Summer Olympics. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. undefinedBill william compton Talk   17:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Indefinite Block Requested
✅ You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing/possibly compromised account. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu t/c 18:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Garbage like this edit summary is unacceptable. Thanks for reporting yourself. -- Kinu t/c 18:28, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bailamos 1.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Bailamos 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:34, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bumptop-desk2 600.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Bumptop-desk2 600.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:47, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Listing of Template:LayoutTemplateArgs at templates for discussion
Template:LayoutTemplateArgs has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)