User talk:ATC/September—December 2010/Archive 7

{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="width: 100%; background-color: #C0C0C0; border: 1px solid #1234aa; vertical-align: top;" '' ''
 * style="background-color: #cfc; border-width: 1px 4px 4px 1px; border-style: solid; border-color: #88a; vertical-align: top;" rowspan="3" |
 * style="background-color: #cfc; border-width: 1px 4px 4px 1px; border-style: solid; border-color: #88a; vertical-align: top;" rowspan="3" |

Excessive edits
It's really bad practice to edit an article 25 times in one day (example, Weeds). You can make all these changes in one edit. (Not that you should have, since you didn't source *any* of your changes...) Darkxsun (talk) 02:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that and I will edit more on the article all at once. Also, much of the article (in the season synopses) isn't sourced even before I added the information. ATC . Talk 04:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Also I've just checked the article's history section (with your comments) and realized I added a few too detailed information that made the sentences long and vague. Sorry about that. :) ATC . Talk 05:04, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Saw new edits. So far so good IMO. Hope I wasn't too harsh... Adding random quotes that didn't add anything to the surrounding paragraph (Shane called his mom a whore... irrelevant), etc were the things I found detrimental to the article. Another Ex: it's pretty clear that her son being sexually active at a young age won't make her happy. "much to her dismay" isn't needed here (you overused that phrase a lot). And, agreed, way too much of this is unsourced :( I wonder if sources even exist for 1/2 of this stuff beyond the show itself. We may end up with a drastically shorter article if we start sticking to the rules :P Thanks for your understanding and contributing to the article, and let's both try to be open and remember this is an encyclopedia... and we should decide what belongs and what doesn't with that in mind. Good luck. Darkxsun (talk) 06:26, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh but I thought it met the same rules as in a plot section for a film article, where sources are unnecessary as it clutters the article. Doesn't that apply to a series article with a season synopses as well? ATC . Talk 14:30, 11 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but I disagree with Darkxsun here re: bad practice to edit many times, or the need to make all edits in one; I edit many article that many times a day, and find it easier to follow changes when edits are made individually. If there is a problem with specific edits, that's another matter. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 14:34, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Weeds (TV series)
RE: - Amazon is not a reliable source. If you want to quote a previously published review that amazon is requoting, you would need to cite the original source. Active Banana   ( bananaphone  13:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay thanks for reminding me. I will do so. ATC . Talk 00:01, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:GeorgeLopez-NBB.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:GeorgeLopez-NBB.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Thinking in Pictures: My Life with Autism
When did you want to get started on it? Haven't seen you around much lately.--kelapstick(bainuu) 21:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Weeds logo leaf k1.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:Weeds logo leaf k1.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 15:30, 14 November 2010 (UTC).

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 23:22, 2 December 2010 (UTC).

GOCE Year-end Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC) 