User talk:Accurate123

May 2010
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Lembit Öpik. Thank you. Natet/c 11:55, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Lembit Öpik, you may be blocked from editing. Natet/c 11:59, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

REPLY :-  For some ardent supporters the truth (from a local voter ...) about Mr Opik is clearly unpalatable. Such apparent threats from 'Nate' just serve to weaken the veracity of Wikipedia entries.

10 Years later - I'm not even sure what this was about. From the history you were deleting large paragraphs of referenced material and adding un-referenced opinions both without comments to explain why, I was reverting it per my notes above. If you want to include something please provide a source if you are deleting something sourced please explain why.--Natet/c 14:11, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

August 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saab 9-3. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bahooka (talk) 22:28, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

REPLY :- What utter and abject nonsense! I corrected a major omission (as regards a model which I happen to possess ...) from that page. Describing such an edit as "vandalism" just discredits Wikipedia.

November 2017
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Emily Thornberry. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 15:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Information.svg Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Emily Thornberry has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 15:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

It was neither controversial (assuming the truth about Lady Nugee is not "controversial" ?) NOR "inaccurate" and it contained information freely available over quite a period in various UK newspapers.

Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of car manufacturers of the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gordano ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_car_manufacturers_of_the_United_Kingdom check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_car_manufacturers_of_the_United_Kingdom?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

REPLY :-   I added no such link ! It was automated NOT "added".